QUOTE(tygaboy @ Dec 28 2022, 11:49 AM)
I love people who do things like this: a stupendous time/money sink that may go nowhere. And if it does, only a handful of people will ever want it enough to pay.
You can just picture them, laying awake thinking endlessly about "...would this work? What about...?"
Just a wonderful example of two of my favotite tag lines:
- Because I can.
- Mine is different
Abso-f-ing-loutely LOVE it.
Chase that passion! Rock on, dudes!
A Ferrari swap seems to fit the same bill
Likewise Clay’s 4.0l swap is pretty out there too!
I hope my post didn’t come off as overly negative. I envy them for doing it. I just don’t think the engineering goals are supported by physics.
The T4 crank is a pretty compromised design that exhibits crank whip and pounding of the center bearing when operated within its OEM RPM limit. Sure they could be lightening and balancing it to zero imbalance but forces go up as the square of angular velocity.
Likewise 115 HP/L has been done on naturally aspirated engines but it’s usually done by spinning even faster than 8500 RPM and/or with variable valve timing and 4 valve designs.
I’ll gladly eat crow if they pull it off but God bless em’ for trying it. If I ever hit the lottery I’ve got plenty of money pit projects I’d love to attempt.