...WELL I am exasperated at the lack of creative thought on this subject matter by a few of you guys that are stuck in the monkey see monkey do philosophy of engine building. with your philosophy, and attitude, NOTHING, on the 914 should be altered or improved, as it cannot possably work better, run better, cooler, or with more H.P. ..So , hopefully as my final input to this post I Will continue to build.em my way and you build,em your way. staying as you are in the dark ages of technology. the end.
Generally, when dealing with something that was engineered, each piece has a purpose and unless you either determine that you no longer need the purpose (like removing the spray shields from the back of the brakes as you never drive in the rain) you, in an engineering manner, should either retain the item, or develope something to replace it.
This is especially true for WELL designed cars, as many parts on cheaper cars can be improved with a better piece. That being said, the T4 was a very robust aircooled motor for its time and it produced a reasonable amount of power/litre for its time. As we have "improved" the engines we have traded out pieces and improved pieces, but it is VERY rare when we are able to eliminate a piece all together (from the engine, except for things like a heater).
I am just trying to make sure that those who are less engineering inclined think they can just start eliminating parts without consequence.