![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
lonewolfe |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 819 Joined: 12-September 11 From: Oakland, CA Member No.: 13,549 Region Association: Northern California ![]() |
Are any of you running a retun fuel line with carbs?
|
struckn |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,069 Joined: 9-November 11 From: South Central York Pennsyvania Member No.: 13,764 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() |
I'm not running a return line...actually I had Translog GT replace the Plastic Lines with Stainless and they put the Stainless feed line in but left the return line in, disconnected, should the car ever need it in the future.
|
brant |
![]()
Post
#3
|
914 Wizard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,949 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes.
A return fuel line in s a good thing. Keeps the fuel entering the carb cooler Potentially more up and less vapor lock Perhaps not noticeable but? Still better andthere is a reason all factory systems use a return |
Larmo63 |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,267 Joined: 3-March 14 From: San Clemente, Ca Member No.: 17,068 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
|
jcambo7 |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,691 Joined: 24-December 08 From: Graham, WA Member No.: 9,867 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() |
|
porschetub |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,816 Joined: 25-July 15 From: New Zealand Member No.: 18,995 Region Association: None ![]() |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) tell us more????. |
mmascari |
![]()
Post
#7
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 322 Joined: 1-September 14 From: Concord, CA Member No.: 17,850 Region Association: None ![]() |
I guess its not needed on a six but I am running a fuel pressure regulator that has a return on it so I have it connected back to the gas tank. |
brant |
![]()
Post
#8
|
914 Wizard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,949 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Attached thumbnail(s) ![]() |
Krieger |
![]()
Post
#9
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,803 Joined: 24-May 04 From: Santa Rosa CA Member No.: 2,104 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
To be clear the rectangle is the filter. Circle is the pump. Triangle/ hex is the regulator. Right Brant?
|
gothspeed |
![]()
Post
#10
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,539 Joined: 3-February 09 From: SoCal Member No.: 10,019 Region Association: None ![]() |
I like option E with double barb banjos on the carbs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
But it would depend on the type and range of regulator. Second choice would be option D with a Y feeding carbs. |
lonewolfe |
![]()
Post
#11
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 819 Joined: 12-September 11 From: Oakland, CA Member No.: 13,549 Region Association: Northern California ![]() |
I have Dellorto carbs so one has the menu intake line & a double banjo that then feeds the second carb. I was thing if both carbs had double banjo’s that the second outlet on the the slave carb could run as a return line. Do you guys think that would work ok? I do not believe my fuel pressure regulator has an option for a return line.
|
bbrock |
![]()
Post
#12
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,269 Joined: 17-February 17 From: Montana Member No.: 20,845 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
I like option E with double barb banjos on the carbs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) But it would depend on the type and range of regulator. Send choice would be optio D with a Y feeding carbs. To make sure I understand correctly, C and D would require a bypass style regulator while B and E would use blocking type. Do I have that right? |
gothspeed |
![]()
Post
#13
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,539 Joined: 3-February 09 From: SoCal Member No.: 10,019 Region Association: None ![]() |
I like option E with double barb banjos on the carbs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) But it would depend on the type and range of regulator. Second choice would be option D with a Y feeding carbs. To make sure I understand correctly, C and D would require a bypass style regulator while B and E would use blocking type. Do I have that right? Yes, there are regulators that 'send out' a regulated target pressure (inline) and some that 'bleed out' anything over your target pressure (return). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
ChrisFoley |
![]()
Post
#14
|
I am Tangerine Racing ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,986 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Bolton, CT Member No.: 209 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I like option E with double barb banjos on the carbs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) But it would depend on the type and range of regulator. Send choice would be optio D with a Y feeding carbs. To make sure I understand correctly, C and D would require a bypass style regulator while B and E would use blocking type. Do I have that right? Yes, except that in option B the upstream regulator is useless. A blocking regulator is needed downstream. We had a 914 here recently which came with a single carb that had an internal regulator. It needed the return line to work. Otherwise I don't think I've ever seen a 914 with a carb setup in my shop (other than stock 914-6) that used a return line. |
anderssj |
![]()
Post
#15
|
Dog is my copilot... ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,736 Joined: 28-January 03 From: VA Member No.: 207 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() ![]() |
I've been running dual dell's with an "option C" return line since the early 1980s . . . works well. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
bbrock |
![]()
Post
#16
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,269 Joined: 17-February 17 From: Montana Member No.: 20,845 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
I like option E with double barb banjos on the carbs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) But it would depend on the type and range of regulator. Send choice would be optio D with a Y feeding carbs. To make sure I understand correctly, C and D would require a bypass style regulator while B and E would use blocking type. Do I have that right? Yes, except that in option B the upstream regulator is useless. A blocking regulator is needed downstream. We had a 914 here recently which came with a single carb that had an internal regulator. It needed the return line to work. Otherwise I don't think I've ever seen a 914 with a carb setup in my shop (other than stock 914-6) that used a return line. And that answers my next question about option B (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I'm planning to run a return line on my carbed /4. I might want to switch back to FI in the future so it seems like a good way to future-proof the setup. Plus, I like the idea of a return line anyway. |
brant |
![]()
Post
#17
|
914 Wizard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,949 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Socalandy |
![]()
Post
#18
|
Its got to be Yellow!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,432 Joined: 29-August 09 From: Orange Member No.: 10,742 Region Association: Southern California ![]() ![]() |
covered here, im running tangerine lines with PMO regulator. Works great (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=246855 |
North Coast Jim |
![]()
Post
#19
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 339 Joined: 11-December 15 From: Northern Ohio Member No.: 19,450 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region ![]() ![]() |
No return line in use with 44 IDFs. Car runs great after sorting out the jetting issues. I used the tunnel grommets to run a 2 conductor wire for power as the fuel pump was relocated to the front under the gravel panel.
|
1adam12 |
![]()
Post
#20
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 209 Joined: 25-May 17 From: Chino Hills, CA Member No.: 21,132 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
What's up guys! I just purchased a pair of Dell 40's which I'm currently rebuilding at the moment. I like the idea of running a fuel return for 1.7 as some have discussed but my question has to do with the fuel pump and regulator set up. Can you run a low pressure (rotary style) fuel pump i.e. (CB Performance / Carter) with Option E and delete the regulator from the drawing? Or would I need to keep a high pressure set up with a good aftermarket regulator like Mallory ect. to make up for the amount of flow for the return and not flood the carbs?
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 11:22 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |