Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Fuel System Damper, why not?
yarin
post Feb 6 2006, 01:33 PM
Post #1


'14-X'in FOOL
***

Group: Members
Posts: 988
Joined: 13-May 03
From: Guttenberg, NJ
Member No.: 693
Region Association: North East States



I couldn't find that much info on here.... Pelican lists a damper in the FI system.

http://www.pelicanparts.com/914/Parts/Fuel...system1_big.htm

Which years and which systems include this? Why leave it out?

I'm building a MS system, do i need a damper in the system? Thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post Feb 6 2006, 01:38 PM
Post #2


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,445
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



I have worked on 914s for 20 years, and I have yet to see a fuel system damper. It may be a VW diagram that is reused for a 914.


Cap'n, you have any input on this???

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TimT
post Feb 6 2006, 01:38 PM
Post #3


retired
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,033
Joined: 18-February 03
From: Wantagh, NY
Member No.: 313



if you are batch firing the injectors a damper is supposed to help out, dont think you need it with sequential.

Dampers

My 911 is batch fired EFI, and I have no damper plumbed in that system, and it seems to run fine, which makes me wonder if they are really needed
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Feb 6 2006, 01:59 PM
Post #4


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



That's a VW Type 3 diagram, which MOSTLY applies to the T4/914 engines. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post Feb 6 2006, 02:11 PM
Post #5


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,445
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



Thanks Cap'n.


You have just confirmed that my memory is not completely gone........


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 6 2006, 03:00 PM
Post #6


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



From personal experience, if you omit the damper on the Type 3, you get a whining noise just after startup. I've noticed no other effects from removing that damper (redid all the fuel lines, and didn't want yet another pair of connections).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wwhalenc
post Feb 6 2006, 05:14 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 19-April 05
From: Boulder,CO
Member No.: 3,950



Looks to be the same as the "accumulator" used a la VW CIS cars to help maintain the fuel system pressurization. Might help for starting??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 6 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #8


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (wwhalenc @ Feb 6 2006, 03:14 PM)
Looks to be the same as the "accumulator" used a la VW CIS cars to help maintain the fuel system pressurization. Might help for starting??

Nope, it's not an accumulator. No check valve on the damper. CIS needs 100psi of fuel pressure to operate, and it takes the fuel pump a bit of time to work up that pressure from zero w/o an accumulator. D-Jet (which the Type 3 also uses) only uses 29psi, and 1-2 secs of fuel pump operation on key on is enough to generate that pressure. The VW system mounts all of the relays under the dash, so you go key on, click, fuel pump whirrs, click, fuel pump goes off, twist key to start, vroom. The 914 also does all of this, but you can't hear it as clearly as the relays (and often the fuel pump) are mounted in the engine bay.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wwhalenc
post Feb 6 2006, 06:04 PM
Post #9


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 19-April 05
From: Boulder,CO
Member No.: 3,950



So it's just helping maintain a stable pressure behind the injectors...so there's not a pressure drop for a long duration/high volume injector squirt? I guess that'd be somewhat consistent with TimT's statement
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 6 2006, 06:37 PM
Post #10


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (wwhalenc @ Feb 6 2006, 04:04 PM)
So it's just helping maintain a stable pressure behind the injectors...so there's not a pressure drop for a long duration/high volume injector squirt? I guess that'd be somewhat consistent with TimT's statement

Honestly, I think it's there only to prevent the odd resonant noise the system makes. Most EFI systems get away w/o a damper and are otherwise very similar to D-Jet in operation, esp. wrt possible pulsations in the fuel system caused by the injectors operating. Remember that D-Jet was the very first production EFI system available, so they were still learning how to make it all work. The 914 version of the D-Jet doesn't have the damper. The two L-Jet systems I've worked on didn't have one, either.

The damper was also up by the fuel pump in the nose of the car, not back by the fuel rails, and with all of the rubber lines involved in the Type 3 injection system, I'd say they would provide as much damping as you'd need for reducing any pulses in the fuel lines caused by the injectors.

Note, btw, that the noise goes away by the time the injectors are running. It's only there while the injectors are NOT running and the pump is operating. It's just as likely it's some characteristic of the pump.

MAYBE if you're running EFI with lots and lots of hard line running fuel, you'd see some benefit from such a damper. On a 914 with a stock or near stock system, it's clearly not needed.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Air_Cooled_Nut
post Feb 7 2006, 12:11 AM
Post #11


914 Ronin - 914 owner who lost his 914club.com
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Member No.: 584
Region Association: None



QUOTE (lapuwali @ Feb 6 2006, 01:00 PM)
From personal experience, if you omit the damper on the Type 3, you get a whining noise just after startup. I've noticed no other effects from removing that damper (redid all the fuel lines, and didn't want yet another pair of connections).

There was a discussion about the fuel damper on the T3 email list (400+ members worldwide) and nobody noticed a single difference with/without it. No power loss/gain, no mileage loss/gain, and nobody mentioned anything about noise differences.

I had one on my late model automatic T3 and took it off. Saw/heard/felt no differences whatsoever. It's a real stumper because not all vehicles got them. ???

Take it off. If you suddenly feel/hear a difference then put it back on. You won't damage anything.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Feb 7 2006, 04:19 AM
Post #12


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,515
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



Cut and pasted from the net. Cause I don't know shit bout this.

1:
Whenever multiple high-flow injectors are installed on a fuel rail, hydraulic pulsations from the injectors opening and closing cause the fuel to “hammer” back and forth. This creates pressure and flow variations within the rail and can lead to large inconsistencies in fuel delivery from cylinder to cylinder. A damper is used to absorb these pressure fluctuations and allow each injector to receive the proper amount of fuel pressure and flow, eliminating rich or lean cylinders, etc.

2: NOTE: Some factory cars have fuel dampers from the factory. Toyota, Nissan, Mazda RX-7 etc.

3: Dampers are placed specific to each combination. Some are a simple diaphragm located after the in tank fuel pump and before the fuel filter. Some are at the fuel rail. It depends on the specific application.

4: According to a couple of ricer guys. Several BIG Racers (eech) use large dampers at the end of their fuel rails.

5: Some dampers are spring loaded to help dampen. Some are simple cannisters with a foam interior. And some are air cushioned.

Thats all I know from Google.

Obviously they have some use. As so many factory cars have them.

Twystd1

Note: If any of this data is incorrect. Blame it on Slits.. Just because...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 7 2006, 12:13 PM
Post #13


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



The two Mazda RX-7s I had (both with EFI) didn't have dampers on them. I can't remember if the only Nissan I owned had a damper or not. The Mazda Miata I had DID have a damper on the rail.

Putting them on the ends of the fuel rails I can see as maybe being useful. The idea is that the pressure in the rail will fluctuate substantially as each injector opens and closes. This could cause some surging in the rail that may affect fuel mixtures from injector to injector and injection event to injection event. It would likely be more useful if you were running BIG injectors, as the pressure changes will be more substantial. Drag guys, who not only run giant injectors, but also tune their engines to within a squeak of blowing up, very likely may see a difference with dampers on the rails.

There are also stories about people claiming to see differences between having a fuel rail fed at one end v. having it fed in the center (esp. true on inline fours or sixes). No hard data, just stories. Also, no evidence that the pressure variations seen in the rails actually made any difference to how the engine ran.

None of this makes any difference on a 914, or a Type 3, since they have so much rubber in the fuel system, and they run at fairly low pressure to start with.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th July 2025 - 04:14 AM