Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> oil cooler adaptors, 3/8 vs. 1/2 inch sandwhich style
realred914
post Aug 24 2010, 02:54 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



looking for a good sandwhich adaptor to add an oil cooler. want one with a thermostat built in, I see several brands for sale, there are some big price differances too.

at any rate there are some ones that have 3/8 inch NPT inlet/outlet threads, and others that have 1/2 inch NPT threads inlet and outlet. the price differenace is considerable (nearly 3X)

seeing as the oil passages upto the filter are not all that fat anyway I figure, how much benifit would one get out of a 3/8 NPT fitting verses the 1/2 NPT? I still plan to use AN10 hose and fittings and have 1/2 inch NPT on the oil cooler itself, so the biggest restriction in the new system would be the 3/8 NPT fittings on the sandwhich adaptor. will this be a significant flow restriction or not verses the larger adaptor? the engine will be a daily driver motor, not a high rpm race motor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 18)
Mark Henry
post Aug 24 2010, 03:16 PM
Post #2


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



I take that this is for a /4?

Why do you need a built in T-stat? If going to a cooler I'd use a separate mocal T-stat. All the built-ins I've seen are cheap Chinese crap.

The 3/8 is all you need for as /4, I only use Parker push-loc hose and fittings with no clamps.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
underthetire
post Aug 24 2010, 03:20 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,062
Joined: 7-October 08
From: Brentwood
Member No.: 9,623
Region Association: Northern California



Try to find a adapter out of a for police interceptor (crown vic). They are supposed to fit, have the thermostat in them, and actually work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realred914
post Aug 24 2010, 03:22 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Aug 24 2010, 02:16 PM) *

I take that this is for a /4?

Why do you need a built in T-stat? If going to a cooler I'd use a separate mocal T-stat. All the built-ins I've seen are cheap Chinese crap.

The 3/8 is all you need for as /4, I only use Parker push-loc hose and fittings with no clamps.



the brands I am considering are Hayden or Derale there versions are 3/8 inch inlet/outlet. any opinions on them? I like the idea of the built in thermostate, less mounting of stuff, fewer fittings.


any word on hayden or Derale quality????

thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realred914
post Aug 25 2010, 07:50 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



any one have experiences with Derale or Hayden sandwhich adaptors, know of quality issues with these brands?

thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Aug 25 2010, 04:44 PM
Post #6


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,347
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



I'm running a Transdapt remote filter on my V8. Very nice billet machined piece. The typical V8 filter uses a 3/4 center thread to screw it on. I would lean to the larger 1/2 version. The system will have more parasidic drag through the adapter and thermostat so the larger size will benefit you. I'm not convinced you need a thermostat but I don't know what engine you have.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 25 2010, 05:25 PM
Post #7


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



I've installed a few. All of them looked pretty much the same. I use the 3/8" version.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realred914
post Aug 25 2010, 11:18 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



QUOTE(McMark @ Aug 25 2010, 04:25 PM) *

I've installed a few. All of them looked pretty much the same. I use the 3/8" version.



McMark you use a thermostat???? I was under the imression it is a good idea to allow oil to heat up faster on cold starts.


tradisrad has a thremostat one in his car, not sure how much difference it makes, verse no thermostat???????
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Aug 25 2010, 11:29 PM
Post #9


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



I had a mocal sandwich adapter on my racecar....with integrated t-stat.
ran the oil lines to the front trunk with a 25 row oil cooler and a large electric fan....work great and never had heating problems...fan was hooked up to my foglight switch... (no fog lights on racecar (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif))

I will eventually mount a cooler in the rear somewhere on my current '75. Probably will do another sandwich adapter with integrated t-stat. some sort of fan on the cooler for stop and go traffic, since this is my DD. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realred914
post Aug 25 2010, 11:56 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



QUOTE(DanT @ Aug 25 2010, 10:29 PM) *

I had a mocal sandwich adapter on my racecar....with integrated t-stat.
ran the oil lines to the front trunk with a 25 row oil cooler and a large electric fan....work great and never had heating problems...fan was hooked up to my foglight switch... (no fog lights on racecar (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif))

I will eventually mount a cooler in the rear somewhere on my current '75. Probably will do another sandwich adapter with integrated t-stat. some sort of fan on the cooler for stop and go traffic, since this is my DD. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)



tradisrad did a think it was a 72 plate cooler with a six inch fan, mounted up above and too the side of the tranny under the rear trunk floor. works like a charm, 180F temps all day long he used the mocal thermostat adaptor also.

for price reason and availability I wil probably go with a Derale 15702 or a hayden 205 thermostat sandwhich adaptor, both have 3/8 NPT ports, and about half cost of the mocal. hayden can be found for a low as $30 at Summit, Derale is priced $45 at summit
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tradisrad
post Aug 26 2010, 07:25 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 985
Joined: 11-September 06
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 6,815
Region Association: Northern California



realred, don't foget this thread: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=108328 . I am sure you will be fine with the 3/8 adapter. It will be winter before you get it ready to install if you keep lagging on getting your parts!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Aug 26 2010, 08:37 AM
Post #12


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



plates and rows are two different things (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Aug 26 2010, 08:42 AM
Post #13


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,949
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(realred914 @ Aug 25 2010, 11:18 PM) *

McMark you use a thermostat???? I was under the imression it is a good idea to allow oil to heat up faster on cold starts.



maybe I'm misunderstanding your post
but to be clear.. a thermostat does allow the oil to heat up faster by keeping it out of the cooler on cold starts...

the thermostat also protects the cooler.


on both both of the race cars I've used coolers we have skipped the thermostats because we could control the start up situation, also because we normally are not running in freezing weather, due to weight, and finally because the restriction of a thermostat does degrade maximum cooling (slightly)

however is my old street car with a front cooler I did use a thermostat
and in the cooler I'm about to install on the rear of this street car I also am going to use a thermostat.

brant
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realred914
post Aug 26 2010, 09:13 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,086
Joined: 1-April 10
From: california
Member No.: 11,541
Region Association: None



QUOTE(DanT @ Aug 26 2010, 07:37 AM) *

plates and rows are two different things (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)



rows of plates is what it looks like to me. If my 914 was a boat, I'd row it, but since it is a car, i will chrome plate it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 26 2010, 09:34 AM
Post #15


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



The thermostat isn't just about 'freezing weather'. You want the oil to come up to ideal temperature as quickly as possible. If you have a cooler without a thermostat, it takes longer for this to happen. You could skip the thermostat if you leave any fans turned off, and you don't move the car until optimum oil temp is reached.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tradisrad
post Aug 26 2010, 09:43 AM
Post #16


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 985
Joined: 11-September 06
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 6,815
Region Association: Northern California



the mocal thermostat that I am using always allows some oil to goto the cooler and when it closes all of the oil is diverted to the cooler first. I have noticed that it takes the oil a few more miles to heat up. with the cooler and lines I've added about another quart and a half of oil so I've got more to heat up.

we hardly ever have freezing weather in the Bay Area.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
charliew
post Aug 26 2010, 03:01 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,363
Joined: 31-July 07
From: Crawford, TX.
Member No.: 7,958



I was always under the impression that any oil line should be as large on the id as any oil gallery that the pump feeds or bigger if the lines are long to prevent the oil from being restricted. When the oil is restricted it gives a false oil pressure reading at the bearings but that is only on a full flow oil cooler system not a bypass oil cooler system. On the bypass oil cooler I would still want at least 1/2 id oil lines. 10an is 10/16 or 5/8 id.

My shade tree math is as follows: 1/2 is 4/8 therefore 3/8 is 25% less volume than 1/2 not counting the wall restriction.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carr914
post Aug 26 2010, 05:20 PM
Post #18


Racer from Birth
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 124,877
Joined: 2-February 04
From: Tampa,FL
Member No.: 1,623
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(brant @ Aug 26 2010, 10:42 AM) *

QUOTE(realred914 @ Aug 25 2010, 11:18 PM) *

McMark you use a thermostat???? I was under the imression it is a good idea to allow oil to heat up faster on cold starts.



maybe I'm misunderstanding your post
but to be clear.. a thermostat does allow the oil to heat up faster by keeping it out of the cooler on cold starts...

the thermostat also protects the cooler.


on both both of the race cars I've used coolers we have skipped the thermostats because we could control the start up situation, also because we normally are not running in freezing weather, due to weight, and finally because the restriction of a thermostat does degrade maximum cooling (slightly)

however is my old street car with a front cooler I did use a thermostat
and in the cooler I'm about to install on the rear of this street car I also am going to use a thermostat.

brant


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

Also on the sandwich plate I had on my -4 Track car, I saw serious heat transference as the whole plate got hot.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pcar916
post Aug 26 2010, 05:23 PM
Post #19


Is that a Lola?
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,523
Joined: 2-June 05
From: Little Rock, AR
Member No.: 4,188
Region Association: None



QUOTE(charliew @ Aug 26 2010, 01:01 PM) *

I was always under the impression that any oil line should be as large on the id as any oil gallery that the pump feeds or bigger if the lines are long to prevent the oil from being restricted. When the oil is restricted it gives a false oil pressure reading at the bearings but that is only on a full flow oil cooler system not a bypass oil cooler system. On the bypass oil cooler I would still want at least 1/2 id oil lines. 10an is 10/16 or 5/8 id.

My shade tree math is as follows: 1/2 is 4/8 therefore 3/8 is 25% less volume than 1/2 not counting the wall restriction.


Actually the area is exponential, so an increase or decrease is a LOT more or a LOT less.That's because PI "are squared"! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 02:15 PM