 Aside from the cache, why a six over a four with same h.p.? Smoothness?, 1970-1976 914-4, 914-6 |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| unpolire |
 Mar 30 2012, 08:48 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 6-July 08 From: Los Angeles CA Member No.: 9,260 Region Association: Southern California  |
I have never driven a stock original 2.0 914-6. I have driven properly converted 914s with 2.7/3.0 transplants and my own stock 1.7Ls. Aside from the cache of a six in back, if you can have 200-250 h.p. from a four, why convert to a six? Is there a noticeable difference in torque and smoothness over a properly modified four? Can you feel it on the road? A serious question seeking the definitive answer that could save $10-20K later. Let's hear from both camps, pluses and minuses.
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| TheCabinetmaker |
Apr 3 2012, 10:30 AM
Post
#2
|
|
I drive my car everyday Group: Members Posts: 8,336 Joined: 8-May 03 From: Tulsa, Ok. Member No.: 666 |
Its a no brainer. The only thing to consider is how much money you have to spend.
Do I love my Raby inspired djet cammed 2056? Hell yes! Is it twice as fun as a stock 2L? Hell yes! Is it still a 4? does it sound like a 4? Hell yes! Would I do a six conversion if I had the bucks? HELL YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! See? Simple. BTW JP, I still drive my car everyday. 12K on the engine in 8 months. Not a problem one. |
|
|
|
| J P Stein |
Apr 3 2012, 10:56 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(vsg914 @ Apr 3 2012, 09:30 AM)  BTW JP, I still drive my car everyday. 12K on the engine in 8 months. Not a problem one. You'll get no argument from me about the reliability of a 125 hp (or so) T-4. A good set-up for a 914. My old stocker 2.0 went nearly 100k miles before a rebuild ....according to the records. After 140kish it was toast.....2 cracked heads.....but the bottom end was still good. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
unpolire Aside from the cache, why a six over a four with same h.p.? Smoothness? Mar 30 2012, 08:48 AM
MoveQik
I have never driven a stock original 2.0 914-6. ... Mar 30 2012, 08:56 AM
unpolire Are you asking about any 6 versus a big/4?
[/quote... Mar 31 2012, 05:45 PM Steve Do a search.. This has been hashed over hundreds o... Mar 30 2012, 09:02 AM unpolire
Do a search.. This has been hashed over hundreds ... Mar 30 2012, 07:11 PM Steve
[quote name='Steve' post='1656788' date='Mar 30 2... Mar 31 2012, 08:54 PM unpolire
[quote name='Steve' post='1656788' date='Mar 30 ... Mar 31 2012, 09:58 PM Steve
[quote name='Steve' post='1657959' date='Mar 31 2... Apr 1 2012, 09:54 AM SirAndy Beware a big six or any other 220+ hp engine in a ... Apr 3 2012, 12:04 PM carr914 Exactly, because it takes a lot ( Raby) to get to ... Mar 30 2012, 09:04 AM SLITS A big four with lots of horsepower is a limited ti... Mar 30 2012, 09:11 AM Tom_T All good points, but if you're comparing a sto... Mar 30 2012, 09:20 AM gothspeed
All good points, but if you're comparing a st... Mar 30 2012, 10:46 AM sixerdon
All good points, but if you're comparing a st... Mar 31 2012, 08:36 AM Bleyseng
All good points, but if you're comparing a s... Mar 31 2012, 05:53 PM jcd914 The sound!
What sounds better than a Porsche ... Mar 31 2012, 02:06 AM unpolire
The sound!
What sounds better than a Porsche... Mar 31 2012, 05:42 PM J P Stein I'll assume you know something about engines a... Mar 31 2012, 10:03 AM Cairo94507 There is nothing like the sound of a six. Mar 31 2012, 10:15 AM brant the -6 motor is 250lbs heavier
but early cars wei... Mar 31 2012, 10:33 AM mepstein I was under the assumption that the 2.0 six engine... Mar 31 2012, 02:54 PM GeorgeRud Porsche discontinued the -6 as they were not makin... Mar 31 2012, 03:20 PM campbellcj The six will run all day long at 6,000+ RPM. For 2... Mar 31 2012, 05:28 PM gothspeed The 6 would be my cost/trouble 'is no object... Mar 31 2012, 05:46 PM mepstein A 200-250hp 4 is a specialized exotic beast. A 3.2... Mar 31 2012, 07:21 PM a914622 For me its all about long term durability. Im gett... Mar 31 2012, 09:37 PM unpolire
I am in process of putting an svx engine back to... Mar 31 2012, 09:47 PM shuie overhead cams, the sound of MFI at 7000+ RPM, the ... Mar 31 2012, 09:52 PM Crazyhippy 200HP... :lol4: :rotfl:
:evilgrin: Mar 31 2012, 10:02 PM J P Stein Let's throw this challenge up to the big 4 afi... Apr 1 2012, 07:41 PM Rand 4 is lighter, 6 lasts longer
If all you want is ... Apr 1 2012, 08:38 PM J P Stein The reponse from the T-4 crowd was as I expected.... Apr 3 2012, 09:46 AM unpolire
BTW, proper spelling of the word as used is cache... Apr 3 2012, 10:24 PM dlestep Bought my used '73 914 in 1988 and drove it fo... Apr 3 2012, 11:56 AM JmuRiz
If I had my way I'd do this !!!... Apr 4 2012, 07:51 AM ape914 Now a v-8 is the way to go for reliable, inexpensi... Apr 3 2012, 11:59 AM Jake Raby
Closer to 12-13K in reality these days.. I just u... Apr 3 2012, 01:11 PM andys Hey, a thread I can actually opine on! In ... Apr 3 2012, 01:29 PM brp986s I miss my -4. It was so nimble compared to my 3.2... Apr 4 2012, 09:58 AM J P Stein
I miss my -4. It was so nimble compared to my 3.... Apr 4 2012, 10:23 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 07:11 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.