![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
JeffBowlsby |
![]()
Post
#1
|
914 Wiring Harnesses & Beekeeper ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 9,091 Joined: 7-January 03 From: San Ramon CA Member No.: 104 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
In another post it was said. ‘Wife bought a new Bronco in 2022. We sold it a few months ago and bought a 1972 Bronco to replace it.’
Been pondering the same dilemma. Not talking about sports cars in this thread. New cars are expensive to buy, maintain, repair and insure. Loaded with tech, and numerous features they can be very complicated. Even lower cost new cars can fit this description. A recent article says new cars average $50K now, even an F150 pickup is reportedly $65K. The new cars we really want can be over six figures. New cars depreciate like rocks whereas vintage car values are much more stable. I’m thinking fully restored cars that would pass a thorough PPI. No project cars. No complicated cars. No “they only made X of these” with an inflated cost. No 40 Ford restorods or Model As. Nothing particularly ostentatious. I think the possibilities, risks, rewards of a good quality vintage car instead of new could be advantageous. We need to consider at least reliability, availability of shops that can provide service, parts availability. Certainly reasonable safety is important which most older cars are not well equipped. Collector insurance may help reduce costs if that fits the situation. Which specific vehicles would you consider as good candidates for a family car be it a sedan, SUV or minivan? Both domestic and imports, low mileage, well cared for. Condition is more important than collectibility. Probably A/C is a must but could be retrofitted. Want to focus on vehicles that would be reliable as daily drivers. I am thinking of 60s-70s Chevys, Fords, 2000s Hondas and Toyotas. 1975 and earlier would be beneficial to those of us in CA. Valued at something less than $50K. What are your ideas? |
![]() ![]() |
peteinjp |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 212 Joined: 15-July 21 From: Japan Member No.: 25,723 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Funny to me to think of a car from 2000 on as old..... My scale is way off as even my 964 seems modern to me.
Personally if gas mileage is not a big concern (mostly local stuff) I prefer land cruisers. I have a BJ43 and an HZJ73- both 2 door middle length diesels (cheaper fuel in my area.) The BJ43 is a soft top so that's loads of fun to open up. Any land cruiser though the 100 series is probably a very good bet in terms of parts availability and loooong lifespan. No doubt the mechanicals in my trucks will outlast me if I keep up on the rust. I'd consider a 60 series in the U.S. Dirt simple trucks that can haul a family and gear. Plenty of repair info out there and so far no issue with consumables. Many of the parts were span model to model- like axle/dif stuff and brakes. Pete |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th October 2025 - 08:07 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |