I am thinking about being rash! |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
I am thinking about being rash! |
Bleyseng |
Feb 26 2005, 08:36 PM
Post
#1
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Picked up a 2.4l six today and maybe this one has found a home if I scrap all my big 2.4L four plans.
I can't decide: Big screaming four or 2.4lsix or wait to save up some more money and install a 3.2! What do you think I should do?? Geoff Attached image(s) |
ArtechnikA |
Feb 27 2005, 09:07 AM
Post
#2
|
||
rich herzog Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
okay - -something- is wrong with this picture... (or you've found out why it runs like crap and was available to you cheap...) a 72-73 2,4 911T engine should probably have come with Zeniths but a Weber change is not uncommon. it does, however, have 7,5:1 compression and the RSR Sprint Cam is a pretty radical profile - i'm surprised there's enough static compression with that much overlap to even get the fire lit. unless it also has big compression pistons, but then you have to wonder if it has had all the other updates necessary to actually use that level of performance (big ports, big valves, uprated valve springs for the rev range where those cams work... RSR sprint cams work great with 3,0 liters and 10.3:1 compression. be interesting to find out what you've got there, really ! the type number is a start - i'm guessing 911/57 |
||