Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Pulled the engine today 914-6 what now?, 2.5 L 20k Miles Aluminum case?
burton73
post Feb 15 2007, 09:03 PM
Post #1


burton73
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,539
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 7,414
Region Association: Southern California



I decided that as my car was not running when I bought it that I was willing to rebuild it if the compression looked bad. This is what I came up with after putting oil in the plugholes and turned it over by hand. It turned very freely very easy. This car has been sitting for 16 years, as it did not pass smog for the PO. He said it ran great when last run. I pulled the Webbers that are in need of rebuild and you can see some carbon in the intake of the head a little so I am thinking vales.

The compression numbers where something like 120,60,80,60,40,70-I read that S cams give lower compression, but something is wrong as the numbers are all over the place. The one 120 may be OK

This is what the engine has according to the PO.
2.5 L 20k Miles Aluminum case 2.2. Rods EMPI, 88 mm pistons and cylinders, Ported heads and manifolds
40 IDS Weber Carbs, CD ignition, 911S Distributor 67 911S Cams

This would be my 3rd 911-engine build so I am not worried I just get help with the cam timing. I have bought a oil fed tensioner set I just do not know if I will need a full rebuild. Do you guys like this engine set up as far as the 2.5 and S cams?Ported, Perer Dawes of Dawes Motorsports built this engine in the late 70s.

Bob



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
burton73
post Feb 16 2007, 11:27 AM
Post #2


burton73
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,539
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 7,414
Region Association: Southern California



The Webbers were off. This is the carbon in a head I am going to break it down to do a valve job at least. The question is to split the cases? I guess I will take it one thing at a time. Fun is good as a short drive is all it will get from me jamming in the city. . I had a 2.7 S with CIS in an 911 that was FAST. I just do not drive like I did when I was young. At 54 I am an old fart but I like to go fast from a stoplight or up the freeway for one ramp from my house to work.

Bob


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RSWannabe
post Feb 16 2007, 11:45 AM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 20-August 06
From: Kirkland, WA
Member No.: 6,692



I love short stroke motors built on the 66mm cranks. They are SO much fun. 2.5 short stroke is a great configuration, especially done on an aluminum case. With some simple valve gear upgrades you can spin these motors past 8,000rpm safely and make great power. That being said, the motor you describe sounds like it might have been built as a race motor. You might want to check your port size. Its possible they have been opened up to a really large diameter, which would hurt your low RPM driveability and might make it not too much fun around town. Please post the numbers for the port size when you measure them.

I'm putting a 2.2S MFI motor into my six, but would love to have and aluminum case 2.5SS. Definitely worth the effort to get runnign right IMHO.

Brooke
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
burton73   Pulled the engine today 914-6 what now?   Feb 15 2007, 09:03 PM
cnavarro   Short stroke 2.5. Nice pocket rocket. 88mm pistons...   Feb 15 2007, 10:08 PM
burton73   Please explain the leakdown test and if one has a ...   Feb 15 2007, 10:28 PM
Justinp71   Did you make sure that your throttle was wide open...   Feb 16 2007, 09:46 AM
Porsche Rescue   I once had a 2.5, S cams, aluminum case in a 914-6...   Feb 16 2007, 10:48 AM
Ferg   Is this the brown six with the gold mesh wheels th...   Feb 16 2007, 11:11 AM
burton73   The Webbers were off. This is the carbon in a head...   Feb 16 2007, 11:27 AM
RSWannabe   I love short stroke motors built on the 66mm crank...   Feb 16 2007, 11:45 AM
burton73   That is my car. I am going to a semi GT with Chrom...   Feb 16 2007, 11:38 AM
RSWannabe   That is my car. I am going to a semi GT with Chro...   Feb 16 2007, 11:55 AM
xitspd   Topper Chasse of POC and IMSA fame had a very hot ...   Feb 16 2007, 11:51 AM
TimT   Your lucky if that is a Dawe built engine. Amon...   Feb 16 2007, 12:13 PM
burton73   One trick Peter Dawe did was to put gas filler at...   Feb 16 2007, 02:46 PM
Cap'n Krusty   2.2 rods are the same as 2 litre rods. I've ne...   Feb 16 2007, 02:48 PM
RSWannabe   2.2 rods are the same as 2 litre rods. That...   Feb 16 2007, 02:58 PM
brant   I think the rod bolts are different in length (be...   Feb 16 2007, 04:08 PM
Racing916   Peter is an amazing engine builder and a great guy...   Feb 16 2007, 05:17 PM
burton73   Cap’n the picture tells it EMPI. I have no idea ...   Feb 16 2007, 07:51 PM
sixnotfour   :type:   Feb 16 2007, 09:19 PM
sixnotfour   Pressure fed tensioner covers wont fit the sandca...   Feb 16 2007, 09:27 PM
burton73   Thanks for the tip on the chain boxes what is the ...   Feb 16 2007, 09:46 PM
sixnotfour   Old School , wont know untill you have a look. Rin...   Feb 16 2007, 10:45 PM
burton73   Jeff, I remember that from my later engines but d...   Feb 16 2007, 11:13 PM
sixnotfour   sure, probably has the cooler cover too; or EASY p...   Feb 16 2007, 11:23 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 12:43 PM