New GB CHT probe NLA closes Oct 29th- if you have the code use today, Code is expiring TODAY $34 we get to get 50 PN 0280130012 |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
New GB CHT probe NLA closes Oct 29th- if you have the code use today, Code is expiring TODAY $34 we get to get 50 PN 0280130012 |
Mikey914 |
Sep 17 2016, 01:17 AM
Post
#1
|
The rubber man Group: Members Posts: 12,638 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None |
Got tired of looking for these some have them listed at $75 and 90, but no Who's interested? I know I need one soon!
Attached image(s) |
Mikey914 |
Oct 22 2016, 09:41 AM
Post
#2
|
The rubber man Group: Members Posts: 12,638 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None |
I’ve done some research into what Paul Anders detailed in the Djet system. From his notes on the 0 280 130 003 and 0 280 130 012 versions of this part he mentioned “012 sensor is in short supply. Either sensor should work OK.” Looks like the curves are actually within 1.5% for the adjustability mixture control. that's on the rich side (of the 003 sensor) or about .5% of the final mixture (as it's about 30%). I’ve checked the resistance curve on these and found them to be within 5%. As the fuel control is only adjustable by about 30% it would mean that the potential error would be about 1.5% too rich for a very cold start (about freezing) . the curve closes the warmer it gets. For those that want to know the actual parts breakdown it goes like this – 70-73 - 1.7 sensor is the 0 280 130 003 74—76 – 2.0 sensor is the 0 280 130 012 73 2.0 used 0 280 130 017 but added a ballast resistor to compensate for the difference in the curve it had. Making it very similar to the 0 280 130 012, but will be richer on warm side and leaner when cold. So the only thing I can possibly see a problem with is the 73 set up with the resistor present. If this applies to you, it’s possible the curve may be off some. If this is noticeable I can’t say for sure until I have feedback. Just to note – Do not run ballast with my part with the ballast or wit will just be way too rich. You will note that the attachment wire protection has been beefed up a little more than the OEM. This is because the wire on the stock part was known to break. I have been told the 73 ECU will work as long as the ballast is not used. Thanks Mark |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 10:30 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |