I started to Putting together my SIX |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
I started to Putting together my SIX |
Racing916 |
Apr 25 2005, 06:37 AM
Post
#21
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 341 Joined: 16-October 04 From: Binghamton, NY Member No.: 2,959 Region Association: North East States |
Looks Sweet!!! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smilie_pokal.gif)
|
J P Stein |
Apr 25 2005, 07:39 AM
Post
#22
|
||
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Go for it.It ain't rocket science. I found it to be....interesting . The sweat didn't start rolling down the crack of my ass till I turned the key (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) |
||
Root_Werks |
Apr 25 2005, 08:22 AM
Post
#23
|
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,319 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Cool, another six! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smilie_pokal.gif)
|
sixnotfour |
Apr 25 2005, 09:54 AM
Post
#24
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 10,430 Joined: 12-September 04 From: Life Elevated..planet UT. Member No.: 2,744 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
WorldPac - calls em rocker shaft orings P/N 911-099-103-52
I am sure some one on East coast has em, if not let me know. Lookin good (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/burnout.gif) |
Kerrys914 |
Apr 25 2005, 05:47 PM
Post
#25
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
Thanks..
Here is what I did to keep track of the valve train. ZIP bags for each valve (1I, 1E, 2I, 2E, 3I, 3E..etc) Might be overkill but better safe the sorry. Attached image(s) |
ArtechnikA |
Apr 25 2005, 08:12 PM
Post
#26
|
||
rich herzog Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
i think they actually started with the 911RSR; there are pictures in Anderson... i can use a couple of sets if the price is right... |
||
Kerrys914 |
Apr 28 2005, 07:19 PM
Post
#27
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/headbang.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/headbang.gif)
Okay I am doing my Sproket Alignment and using Wayne's book. The only things I have done to this engine is a basic top-end rebuild. I would have thought this would be correct since I haven't changed anything about this alignment. I kept the two side in seperate containers until they went back on (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/headbang.gif) I am getting a intermediate shaft distance of 52.02'ish (face of case to shaft). My right sprocket comest to 51.06'ish (case to face of sprocket). I did this 4-5 times and they are all very close to each other. To meet my delta of .25mm I need to get to 51.75'ish which is 3 shims less then I have right now. Could the engine have ran well fo rthe PO if it was that far off? Mayeb I am missing something here? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) Cheers |
TimT |
Apr 28 2005, 07:27 PM
Post
#28
|
||
retired Group: Members Posts: 4,033 Joined: 18-February 03 From: Wantagh, NY Member No.: 313 |
Yes the engine would run just fine with the sprockets misaligned. It would wear the sprockets/chains more quickly though. |
||
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 11:02 AM
Post
#29
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
Okay I found out my dizzy is from a "E" (0231159 006) engine and I believe I have a "T" engine. The PO said it was a "T" so I took it at that.
I have the cam timing set but still have the dial indicator set up on the intake valve. Can I just measure the Intake valve travel and compare my measured value to the specs for the "T" and "E" cams? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/screwy.gif) The only markings I can see now are the dot and an "03" stamped on the end of the cam. Cheers (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beer.gif) |
ArtechnikA |
May 11 2005, 11:11 AM
Post
#30
|
||
rich herzog Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
'course that'll only tell you what your cam is, not your pistons. but you had your heads off, yes - did they look like T pistons? anyway - sure - go for it... but you should know that the valve timimg specs are significantly different for T cams as opposed to E cams... T cams time to 2,5mm +/- 0,2 TDC overlap with 0,1mm clearance E cams time to 3,15mm +/- 0,15 TDC overlap with 0,1mm clearance T total lift, intake, is 36,25mm E total lift, intake, is 36,58mm so ya better measure real accurately. (the BIG difference is on the exhaust, and the duration...) |
||
J P Stein |
May 11 2005, 11:28 AM
Post
#31
|
||
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Yes. There is enuff diference between the 2 to tell which it is. Ya prolly shoulda done that before you set the timing, but no harm, no foul. I measured a set of suspected T cams with a pair of calipers.....figuring I'd get within .010-.020.... top of lobe to backside minus base circle X 1.5 (I'm told that 1.5 ratio is actully varible by .01 either way due to the actual point of contact rides is about a .08 wide band)...came out with in .003 (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) |
||
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 11:35 AM
Post
#32
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
Well since the engine case numbers were "T" and the PO said they were "T" I assumed ( I know) it was a "T".
I know my cams are timed to the 2.5mm spec right now. So the total lift from closed to full open is 36.25mm. I'll check that now. Looks like that wors out to be 1.427" for "T" and 1.440 for the "E". Wish me luck (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) |
J P Stein |
May 11 2005, 11:43 AM
Post
#33
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Ah.....just in case you're calibrated in English units, total lift at the valve for the T is .387", .408 for the E per Mr. Anderson's book.
(edit) -.004 lash. |
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 11:54 AM
Post
#34
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) I am getting .379 on the #4 intake and .379 (a bit under .3785) on #1 intake.
Looks like I do not have an "E" cam in there. |
ArtechnikA |
May 11 2005, 12:12 PM
Post
#35
|
rich herzog Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
the spec book lists those numbers (~36mm) in a big table column labelled "Cam Lift" but i'm having a hard time understanding what that means, exactly - unless it's the total linear distance between the bottom of th sbase circle and the top of the lobe.
the E Exhaust lift (per Anderson) is 0.393" (which could be 0.397" if you didn't account for the 0.004" valve lash). so the "gotta ask" hard questions: are you sure you're on the intake valve, and are you sure you have the Right cam on the right side, and the Left cam on the Left side ? (not questioning your abilities - but - gotta ask - and if you *did* confuse them - first - you wouldn't be the first, and second - wouldn't you rather know now rather than when the engine wanted to turn backward ? |
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 12:29 PM
Post
#36
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
No problem on the questions.
- I am measuring from the intake valves (the ones on the top) - I put the "Big V" cam on the left and the " tight V" cam on the right. The Left is 1,2,3 cylinders (Left looking at the fan). |
J P Stein |
May 11 2005, 12:33 PM
Post
#37
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
A few vairables.
Lash counts as My edit says above. The dial indicator must be rock solid. If it is the long travel type with a straight plunger & about a .150 point, it must be as perpendicular as you can get it to the spring cap or you'll get a bit of cosine error. ......wear on a used cam is gonna effect it also. I'd say your well with in the probability field (.004), me thinks. |
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 12:38 PM
Post
#38
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
I am using the "Z" tool to hold the dial. Not sure when the dial was last calibrated but it seemed okay and YES I do have a long travel dial. It measures .001 up to 2" of travel.
I'll breakdown the setup and retake the measurements with no valve lash. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smash.gif) |
Kerrys914 |
May 11 2005, 12:46 PM
Post
#39
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
Okay I now have .384" with no valve lash, the cam is used so that seems okay for the "T" spec cam.
Looks like my valve lash was .005 before. I guess I need to plan on more drag on the feeler gauge next time. So since I have a "T" spec cam and a "E" spec dizzy what performance issues will I expect? |
Kerrys914 |
May 12 2005, 09:14 AM
Post
#40
|
Dear, the parts I just sold paid for that part ;) Group: Members Posts: 1,568 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Williamsburg, VA Member No.: 16 |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smash.gif)
Does anyone have a timing mark template for a non-914/6 flywheel? Seems like most people just say to put the two flywheels next to each other and just xfer the marks BUT... I don't have a real 914/6 flywheel to do that with (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif) Cheers |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 11:10 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |