Going to Megasquirt, More questions |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Going to Megasquirt, More questions |
bbrock |
Sep 11 2021, 10:46 AM
Post
#1
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,269 Joined: 17-February 17 From: Montana Member No.: 20,845 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
After about 1,700 miles of driving my freshly restored car with rebuilt engine, I’ve decided I’ve had my fun with Weber carbs and distributor-based ignition and am ready to step up to modern EFI and coil on plug ignition. Even with the jetting that came out of the box leaving the carbs running rich, the performance has been fantastic. What is not fantastic is the garage stinking of gasoline, no compensation for altitude, and being generally too fiddly to set up for my taste. My trials with the ignition are documented in another thread. Yes, I know a 1-2-3 would solve those problems but for the money, I’d rather invest in modern COP ignition as part of an EFI upgrade.
My goal is a smooth, efficient, and reliable street machine that I can drive from sea level to 11,000 ft. without starving or choking on fuel. Efficiency is at least as important as performance. As long as I can get at least the stockish 100 hp, I’ll be happy and beyond that, I’d like to wring as many mpg out as possible. The engine is a mostly stock euro-spec 2L engine. The only mod is a fairly mild Elgin 6048 camshaft with 256 duration for the carbs. A source of pride of this build is this custom 911/914-6 inspired air cleaner I made which I think looks cool and really silences the carbs. Now for the questions: • Single throttle body or ITB? I think I’ve made a decision but still interested in thoughts. I was thinking about welding injector bungs onto the carb manifolds and using my carbs as throttle bodies. The main appeal is that I would keep my cool air cleaner to make the other kids jealous. However, it seems the stock throttle body would greatly simplify the conversion. Also, even though the custom intake is designed to allow access for servicing and easy air filter replacement, it does crowd an already crowded engine bay and makes working in there just that much more of a challenge. My stock TB needs some TLC and might have to be sent for professional refurbishing. I think I could sell my carb setup to cover that cost but not sure. The upshot is that I’ve all but decided to go back to the stock TB, but curious what others think. • N Alpha, Speed Density, or MAF? I’ve been reading up on this and think I understand pros and cons, but still a little confused about sensors needed. With my efficiency goal, I think MAF is the way to go. It looks to me that cutting off the tube connecting the stock air cleaner to the TB and replacing it with a MAF could be a really slick way to add MAF in stealth fashion. Has anyone done this? If not, how does one find the right MAF to use? Other than dimensions, what else needs to be considered? Another question is about MAP + MAF vs MAF only. I’m a little confused about advantages or when a MAP sensor is needed if you have a MAF. • Barometric correction – this is an important feature for my location, but the hardware needed to implement it is a little confusing. It seems like if you are running a MAP, then barometric correction is obtained by adding a second pressure sensor (another MAP?) to read reference atmospheric pressure to make corrections to the fuel mixture. How does it work with MAF? Do you only need one pressure sensor to read atmosphere? Or do you still need to reference it against manifold pressure? I assume a lot of this is done in the software but I haven’t looked to far into the tuning part yet. I’m more trying to figure out a shopping list for parts at this point. • Anyone running a CAM sync and sequential spark and injection? Again with the efficiency goal, this is appealing. Looks like Mario is working on a new version which isn’t available yet, are there alternatives available? It seems people say you still need a crank position sensor even with a cam sensor in the mix. It isn’t entirely clear why though. Lastly, and this is mostly just curiosity, but is it correct to think that the lifespan (in miles) of spark plugs are cut in half with wasted spark? I have many more questions but this is already too long so will save them for later. TIA |
VaccaRabite |
Oct 12 2021, 10:22 AM
Post
#2
|
En Garde! Group: Admin Posts: 13,596 Joined: 15-December 03 From: Dallastown, PA Member No.: 1,435 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I worry that the larger picture of building an EFI for a 4 banger aircooled motor is getting lost in the weeds here.
These aren't exactly smooth running motors to begin with, and the engine bay is somewhat open to the elements. I'd reconsider using the Microquirt and adding some simplicity back into your equation. The operational differences between wasted spark and individually controlled plugs isn't going to be noticeable when you are driving the car, but will make it more challenging to build and tune - increasing the time before you are back to driving the car again. Zach |
JamesM |
Oct 12 2021, 12:04 PM
Post
#3
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,002 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
I worry that the larger picture of building an EFI for a 4 banger aircooled motor is getting lost in the weeds here. These aren't exactly smooth running motors to begin with, and the engine bay is somewhat open to the elements. I'd reconsider using the Microquirt and adding some simplicity back into your equation. The operational differences between wasted spark and individually controlled plugs isn't going to be noticeable when you are driving the car, but will make it more challenging to build and tune - increasing the time before you are back to driving the car again. Zach I already tried to sell him on the easy button (well slightly easier button anyways). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) As someone who enjoys this stuff though I full support the effort to go completely overkill! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) I'm actually sort of curious about what will be needed to properly dial in the injector timing and what sort(if any) difference it will wind up making. The tuning process with batch injection is fairly straight forward for the home mechanic with a wideband sensor but to fully dial in sequential injector timing... I suspect that's going to take some serious time and heavy equipment. Lots of stacked variables to deal with. |
bbrock |
Oct 12 2021, 12:36 PM
Post
#4
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,269 Joined: 17-February 17 From: Montana Member No.: 20,845 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Im just going to leave this here to give you more to consider about your injector selection. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) This is the datasheet I got with those A280H injectors The 26lb rating was at 3bar pressure however they provide the flow specs and voltage corrections for running them all the way up to 7 bar!!! I would imagine the 36lb sets come with similar abilities. Have read that higher pressures improve atomization, and if you wanted to look at shortening your injector pulse even further, its something to consider. I was actually wondering about that. What's a safe pressure a Bosch 69133 could run? Need to find specs. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th December 2024 - 05:43 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |