Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Carbs on a completely stock 2.0L, does it work
DanT
post Jan 2 2006, 06:59 PM
Post #61


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



That was the point of my initial query. do you gain anything by switching to carbs with a totally stock motor?
I guess the general feeling is that unless you change the cam you aren't going to gain any performance or drivability. And probably lose some MPG. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dmenche914
post Jan 2 2006, 07:26 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,212
Joined: 27-February 03
From: California
Member No.: 366



expereince with my freinds stock 1.7 was he had problems with the FI (electrical problems with old, bad wires) He switched to carbs, and got horrible mileage, a higher top end, with a big loss in botom end power. After a while i convinced him to fix the FI, we did a rebuild of the harness, tested all components, and put it back on, the car ran great, mileage went back up to about 30 mpg, and it had power at low rpm again.

No we did not optimize the carbs, maybe with re-jetting and such some problems could have been solved, but fixing the FI was easier, cheaper, and gave better results on a stock 1.7 engine. good luck
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MarkV
post Jan 2 2006, 07:56 PM
Post #63


Fear the Jack Stands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,493
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Sunny Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 154
Region Association: None



I think the only gain in the carbs vs Djet debate is reliabilty. My car is a 2056 with DRLA 40's on it with a stock replacement Web cam. It runs great and it is very reliable. I spent some time sorting out jets and vent size and sure it sputters on cold start but once it is warmed up it runs great.

I have all of the parts to convert it back to Djet but I fear 30 year old rudimentary injection reliability problems. How many posts are there about whats wrong with my Djet?

"It won't idle"

"It wont start"

"It bucks & misses"

"Where can I get a new MPS"

"It stranded me"


(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dead horse.gif)


I am still waiting for Kitcarson.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Jan 2 2006, 08:04 PM
Post #64


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



well the deal with D-jet is that most systems are 30 years old. It's indeed a very well designed system, and for a insanely simple system, it works very well. Problems arise when the engine is upgraded, or when the MPS diapragm breaks...other than that it works well for stockish engines....

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ws91420
post Jan 2 2006, 09:36 PM
Post #65


Yes I have one a Lensley 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,063
Joined: 10-September 03
From: Ruther Glen,VA (halfway between sticks and civilization)
Member No.: 1,137
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE (Aaron Cox @ Jan 2 2006, 07:56 PM)


why do you want to ditch FI on a stock motor???? you wont *GAIN* anything without a hot cam.....designed for carbs....


The thing I gained was a running car by switching to carbs w/ stock cam. I dont know for sure if my FI was bad, but it was my descision and I wasnt about to pull the engine apart a second time to put a different cam in. I'll save that for the next rebuild.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JoeSharp
post Jan 2 2006, 09:43 PM
Post #66


In Irvine, Ca. May 15-18
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,947
Joined: 9-July 03
From: DeLand, Florida
Member No.: 898
Region Association: South East States



Welby's piont is the only point for switching. If your fighting a D- jet, L -jet problem and can't find the source of it carbs are the light and, the way to usage of your teener.
:PRMAGRIN: Joe
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Jan 2 2006, 11:10 PM
Post #67


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



Thanks for the replies.
This is another one of those topics like the 4vs6 debate, evidently.

Carbs have their place in our hobby just like some other mods that some folks make to their cars and others only shake their heads and wonder why!

That is the great thing about these little cars. They have so many ways they can be modded and still be a 914. And as always...to each his own.

I guess a switch to carbs will wait until I rebuild the motor with some hotter internals.
As long as I have a stock motor and the EFI is functioning, I have seen nothing here to convince me to switch at this time. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jan 3 2006, 09:18 AM
Post #68


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Every engine is different..... Honestly I have tested a few engine combos that made MORE power with Carbs.

It's all in the combo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Jan 3 2006, 01:15 PM
Post #69


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



Well there you have it... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif)


Jake , just tell us if you can make a stock FOUR run better on Webers than the D-jet. Please. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

thanks


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gearhead1432
post Jan 3 2006, 01:36 PM
Post #70


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Altus, OK
Member No.: 5,304
Region Association: None



From what I recall, most wabers are jetted far too rich for smaller fours like a 1.7 up to a 2.0. You can bolt them on and they will run, it will just eat up fuel like it's going out of style.

When optimized I'm willing to bet you can get more power out of the carbs. The power band might be higher but that's okay with me. I like driving at 3.500rpm (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/driving.gif)

Oh yeah, Webers are eye candy too! For me Djet doesn't do very much. Now TPI, that is an awsome looking FI system.

Rob
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Jan 3 2006, 08:41 PM
Post #71


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



On pg #10 of Haynes, you can see the motors listed and the HP breakdown by cc's.

The 1.8 was available a factory option with dual-single Solex 40's.

Two HP rating's are listed, 76 and 85...who's who?
Differant cam or no?
Was there more than one cam offered on any of the stock motors?

I need to know (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/boldblue.gif)


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom Perso
post Jan 3 2006, 08:43 PM
Post #72


Crazy from the Cold...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Member No.: 1,003



From what I remember, the carb'd motors did have a different cam.

Or, maybe I'm just telling you what you want to hear... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif)

Tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gearhead1432
post Jan 3 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #73


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Altus, OK
Member No.: 5,304
Region Association: None



I'm looking at the book. It looks like the EC motor has 7.3:1cr 76hp @ 4800 rpm and the AN, 8.6:1cr 85hp @ 5000rpm

Looks to me like the carbed motor was European only. It reqired 98octane fuel. Acording to haynes the rest is the same... so yes a pair of Little little 1bbl 40mm solexes make considerable more power than the stock Ljet. Valve timing is the same. I realy doubt it has more lift.

There you go, carbs are better... even little ity bity 40mm solexes....lol (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/boldblue.gif)

-Rob
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Jan 3 2006, 11:13 PM
Post #74


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



Maybe that is the problem, folks are using too large carbs. Especially when they do not have the knowledge or parts to rejet the 40s. Maybe those tiny little Solexs are a better match for our motors than the webers that everyone seems to want or need. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Jan 3 2006, 11:15 PM
Post #75


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,542
Joined: 1-February 03
From: Corona, CA
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE (Dan (Almaden Valley) @ Jan 3 2006, 10:13 PM)
Maybe that is the problem, folks are using too large carbs. Especially when they do not have the knowledge or parts to rejet the 40s. Maybe those tiny little Solexs are a better match for our motors than the webers that everyone seems to want or need. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)

its all in the combo according to jake...

like i said. lawrence's 1.7 was PERFECTLY jetted. no stumble stutter etc.... just prolly a mpg or 2 less than djet fi...

its not the carb...its the jetting that gives carbs a bad name....

do it once...do it right

AA
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Jan 3 2006, 11:43 PM
Post #76


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



Combination as in which carb not just the jetting. Venturis and jetting, overall flow of air and fuel.
Just like a holley 600 vs a holley 650 on a GTO or Mustang, with a big block.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Jan 4 2006, 12:15 AM
Post #77


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



My 2110 VW motor with the dual-single 34 ICT Webers was pretty good when I was a 17 year old.

I was pretty much a "slap it on and go" kind guy back then ( I still am a little bit...ahem (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif) ) So no attention to the jetting was paid.
The carbs came off my 1600cc motor.
I had the motor built to short block using the STOCK CAM. I assembled and ran the motor in my Baja bug and then my '62 crew cab for about five thousand miles before I sold it all off. That thing really pulled.

I bought a Ghia with a 1776cc and dual singles. On a Engle 120 cam...Not stock, but fun...Not a 914, so here I am.

Doesn't somebody have the stock FOUR cam data? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif)

My guess is that they *all* use the same one...My guess. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/cool.gif)


We'll know soon, I'm sure of that.


KT

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Jan 4 2006, 12:25 AM
Post #78


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



On my first 914 I had a 2056 with a big cam, 45 dellortos and some heads with big valves, light flywheel and balancing. Carbs were great under most all conditions until I blew the engine up.

I had it rebuilt and the mechanic would only do relatively stock engine. 2056, stock cam, and 36mm dellortos. It ran like complete shit, I worked with him for about 6 months to get it running right and it never did.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post Jan 4 2006, 12:49 AM
Post #79


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



so where are we?
Any other ideas?

How about you professionals out there. What has been your experiences along these lines?

If the factory infact, built 914s with EFI and Carbs did they only do the induction or did they make changes internally to make the car more drivable with one or the other?

This must have been a Europe only option. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Jan 4 2006, 01:02 AM
Post #80


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



Working...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th July 2025 - 10:31 AM