Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> No L-Jet ever made?, Is AA out of their mind????
deserttoad
post Feb 13 2006, 10:41 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 24-January 06
From: Lovelock, NV
Member No.: 5,468



So I'm pretty new to this Porsche stuff, and I'm looking at this page from AA, and it doesn't show any L-jet FI. I've always thought that what I have in my 1975 1.8. So here are a couple of pics, what is this?

And what's up with this page from AA: http://www.autoatlanta.com/model/914catalo...ne-numbers.html

Are they nuts???


DT



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
deserttoad
post Feb 13 2006, 10:43 PM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 24-January 06
From: Lovelock, NV
Member No.: 5,468



Other half:


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 13 2006, 10:48 PM
Post #3


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Yes, you have L-Jet. All US 1.8s had L-Jet. AA's table looks like it's suffered a cut-and-paste error, as the 2.0 data is under the 1.8 heading.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alpha434
post Feb 13 2006, 10:50 PM
Post #4


My member number is no coincidence.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,154
Joined: 16-December 05
From: Denver, CO
Member No.: 5,280
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Rack another 10 points for AA. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Feb 13 2006, 10:57 PM
Post #5


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE (alpha434 @ Feb 13 2006, 09:50 PM)
Rack another 10 points for AA. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)

its just a typo......


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alpha434
post Feb 13 2006, 11:09 PM
Post #6


My member number is no coincidence.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,154
Joined: 16-December 05
From: Denver, CO
Member No.: 5,280
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Customer confusion.

Typos wage war and lauch missiles and whatnot. The world rises and falls to the will of the written word. An online company can't afford typos. Especially a company that is trying to obtain a positive image from 914 owners.

You're right. It's just a typo. But it should probly be fixed asap. Right? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
deserttoad
post Feb 14 2006, 09:09 AM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 24-January 06
From: Lovelock, NV
Member No.: 5,468



Cool - better their mistake than mine!

thanks,

DT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Feb 14 2006, 10:04 AM
Post #8


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



there was this moon lander that NASA sent out, but i dont remember the name. Dude this was like a multi-billion dollar lander...you know what happened to it? someone, upon entering in flight trajectory maps for the landing decent, one set of engineers used metric, while others used english measurements...a typo.

Nasa watched that thing just crash into the ground.

not that I agree with alpha, but thats what happens when people make typos.



b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kconway
post Feb 14 2006, 10:12 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,347
Joined: 6-December 04
From: Monrovia, CA
Member No.: 3,231
Region Association: Southern California



Making a metric to SAE conversion error is not a typo... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/headbang.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Feb 14 2006, 11:06 AM
Post #10


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,148
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



Same thing happened in Canada back when the Boeing 767 was brand new. A combination of a bad fuel management package and people using a bad combination of conversion factors (lbs/liter) resulted in the flight of the 'Gimli Glider' that fell out of the sky halfway to its destination. The pilot was an experienced glider pilot and brought the plane down on a closed runway. That runway was in use at the time.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Feb 14 2006, 11:48 AM
Post #11


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



QUOTE (kconway @ Feb 14 2006, 10:12 AM)
Making a metric to SAE conversion error is not a typo... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/headbang.gif)

but not writing "ft" next to your contributing number is.

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post Feb 14 2006, 02:26 PM
Post #12


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,474
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE (davep @ Feb 14 2006, 11:06 AM)
Same thing happened in Canada back when the Boeing 767 was brand new. A combination of a bad fuel management package and people using a bad combination of conversion factors (lbs/liter) resulted in the flight of the 'Gimli Glider' that fell out of the sky halfway to its destination. The pilot was an experienced glider pilot and brought the plane down on a closed runway. That runway was in use at the time.

FYI... they jacked up the plane, fixed the nose gear, replaced the slides, refueled it and flew it out of there. It's still in service. It has "Gimili Glider" painted under the pilot's window in big letters. I saw it taxi by in Montreal last December.



The error on it was caused by the switch from imperial gallons to liters. They short filled the plane because the fuel amount was written in imperial gallons, and the pumps had been converted to liters.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Twystd1
post Feb 14 2006, 03:46 PM
Post #13


You don't want to know... really.....
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: 12-September 04
From: Newport Beach, California
Member No.: 2,743



If I bagged on every web site with a typo or a "slip" on data.

I would spend the rest of my life making them wrong.

Just send the vendor an e-mail and see if they change it.

I am NOT a big AA fan.

Regards,
Twystd1
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Feb 14 2006, 06:53 PM
Post #14


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,148
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE (ClayPerrine @ Feb 14 2006, 12:26 PM)
The error on it was caused by the switch from imperial gallons to liters. They short filled the plane because the fuel amount was written in imperial gallons, and the pumps had been converted to liters.

No, not really. They would have had only a quarter of the required fuel then. And they dipped the tanks twice, Toronto and Ottawa. But their conversion from volume to weight was incorrect by half. Basically the difference between lbs and kg (2.2 lbs / kg). It would not have mattered except the electronic guage was malfunctioning.

The mechanics sent from Winnipeg also ran out of fuel before reaching Gimli. It was a million dollar fixup before it flew again.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GTPatrick
post Feb 14 2006, 07:04 PM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 245
Joined: 8-September 05
From: Memphis, Tn.
Member No.: 4,768
Region Association: None



Deserttoad, AA would have to have a mind in the first place to lose it. So you're safe on that assumption.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
deserttoad
post Feb 14 2006, 08:21 PM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 24-January 06
From: Lovelock, NV
Member No.: 5,468



Okay, so now I'm curious. A lot of people here don't talk too highly of AA. So what gives?

I've ordered from PP on only one occasion, and I they had what I needed and I got what I ordered.

I recall somebody here with a signature that said something like "Automobile Atlanta is not a preferred provider".

What makes them so bad, and Pelican so good?

DT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 06:55 AM