Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3.0 guys - anyone running carbs, what cam?
Mike D.
post Feb 7 2007, 02:06 PM
Post #1


OK, It runs now, and pretty good too!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,448
Joined: 3-January 03
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Member No.: 85
Region Association: None



I'm looking at possibly getting a 3.0 but it has no F.I. So I would just run it with webbers.

Does anyone out there have this set up now? Are You running the CIS cam or was it changed out to a early T,E or S?

Bruce Andersons book says it's an easy 200HP with Webbers (set correctly) and headers, and the stock CIS cam.

Any thoughts?

TIA,
Mike D.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Feb 7 2007, 02:17 PM
Post #2


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



The CIS cam is fine....the 964 cam is better. If I recall, most anything else requires head work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brando
post Feb 7 2007, 02:58 PM
Post #3


BUY MY SPARE KIDNEY!!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,935
Joined: 29-August 04
From: Santa Ana, CA
Member No.: 2,648
Region Association: Southern California



906 cams!

Not very streetable but fun.

Actually I'm with mike on the 964 cams.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JWest
post Feb 7 2007, 03:15 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,662
Joined: 6-January 03
From: Fort Worth, TX
Member No.: 97
Region Association: None



The problem is that valves will hit the pistons with the more aggressive cam grinds.

So change pistons and cams if you want something like S or Solex profiles, or go with 964s for the easy (but milder) setup.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LvSteveH
post Feb 7 2007, 06:06 PM
Post #5


I put the Poor in Porsche
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,080
Joined: 22-April 03
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Member No.: 600



Keep in mind that the 964 cams will work better with the higher compression of the later 3.0L (80-83). They really aren't the ideal choice with the 78-79 lower compression motors. If you are planning to eventually upgrade the pistons anyway, it probably makes sense to do the cam at the same time. You'd want something more aggressive than the 964's when you upgrade the pistions.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Feb 7 2007, 06:07 PM
Post #6


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(James Adams @ Feb 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *

The problem is that valves will hit the pistons with the more aggressive cam grinds.

So change pistons and cams if you want something like S or Solex profiles


Like these... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TimT
post Feb 7 2007, 07:06 PM
Post #7


retired
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,033
Joined: 18-February 03
From: Wantagh, NY
Member No.: 313



I have webcam 20/21's in my 3.2 six.. stock CR and no issues with clearance. I suspect the 3.0 is a similar animal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kconway
post Feb 7 2007, 07:47 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,347
Joined: 6-December 04
From: Monrovia, CA
Member No.: 3,231
Region Association: Southern California



Uhhh, Mike, whatya going to do with your 6?
Kevin

QUOTE(Mike D. @ Feb 7 2007, 12:06 PM) *

I'm looking at possibly getting a 3.0 but it has no F.I. So I would just run it with webbers.

Does anyone out there have this set up now? Are You running the CIS cam or was it changed out to a early T,E or S?

Bruce Andersons book says it's an easy 200HP with Webbers (set correctly) and headers, and the stock CIS cam.

Any thoughts?

TIA,
Mike D.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bwilless
post Feb 7 2007, 09:37 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 24-January 03
From: Tempe, AZ
Member No.: 192



The 'E' Cams are the hot setup for a 3.0 with Webers. Ton's of Tourqe down low. I get 200 HP with as much torque to the rear wheels. The valve clearance is close, I think it still has the CIS pistons.

Here's the dyno at the wheels:

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dekman
post Feb 7 2007, 10:35 PM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 458
Joined: 12-December 04
From: Ojai,CA
Member No.: 3,274
Region Association: None



I agree...my engine builder used "E" cams and cosworth pistons. Topped my 3.0L off with some 46 webers. Love it.................. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike D.
post Feb 7 2007, 10:44 PM
Post #11


OK, It runs now, and pretty good too!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,448
Joined: 3-January 03
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Member No.: 85
Region Association: None



QUOTE(kconway @ Feb 7 2007, 05:47 PM) *

Uhhh, Mike, whatya going to do with your 6?
Kevin



Check the Classifieds soon (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) - One of my issues with doing this is that my 2.0 six runs so good and I pretty much know everything about it.


Thanks for the input. The engine I'm looking at is a '78 so the 964 cams are out.

Allen, I couldn't remember what size six you had, but I thought you said you were running the CIS cams?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dgw
post Feb 7 2007, 10:44 PM
Post #12


Dennis Winter
***

Group: Members
Posts: 557
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Santa Cruz Mountains
Member No.: 106
Region Association: Northern California



My six had a stock 82 3.0 with the Webber's off the original six, with lots of changes to the jets and K&N air filters.

my 83 SC has the 964 cams in it. Both engines are terrific.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Feb 7 2007, 11:49 PM
Post #13


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Mike D. @ Feb 7 2007, 08:44 PM) *

Allen, I couldn't remember what size six you had, but I thought you said you were running the CIS cams?


That was before I had the motor torn down the second time to fix some oil leaks. Mechanic said he had a couple solex cams that he wanted to get rid of and I said that since the motors apart go ahead and throw them in...

Wurks gud. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/burnout.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Timo
post Feb 8 2007, 07:04 AM
Post #14


*******
***

Group: Members
Posts: 743
Joined: 13-January 03
From: Finland
Member No.: 137
Region Association: Europe



I have ยด79 3.0 with Solex cams and Webers. Pistons needed valve pockets. Runs fine and strong, but fuel consumpion is baaaaaaaaaad. As soon as I have time I will chance to programmable FI.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Racing916
post Feb 8 2007, 07:12 AM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 341
Joined: 16-October 04
From: Binghamton, NY
Member No.: 2,959
Region Association: North East States



I run a 2.7L w/Carbs and I also use "E" cams that replaced the "S" Cams. E Cams will give you more Tourque. The motor has around 240 HP and about 240 ft. lbs. of Tourque. Compression is 10.9 to 1. I did have to replace the pistons, and now they are correctly domed. I would say the "E" cams are the way to go. The motor with S cams before was not as much fun to drive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Feb 8 2007, 03:10 PM
Post #16


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
The 'E' Cams are the hot setup for a 3.0 with Webers. Ton's of Tourqe down low. I get 200 HP with as much torque to the rear wheels. The valve clearance is close, I think it still has the CIS pistons.


Nope.

I agree E-cams and Webers but you'll need new pistons. That is a VERY nice street engine.

This is where the problem begins with these motors (I have one). If you have Bruces' book, I would recommend what he recommends to start with. I think he basically states "put the Webers on there and backdate the exhaust." (which is what you would have to do with a 914 anyway). He also mentioned advancing the cams 6deg.

Think about it... it's a 180hp motor as is. With the Webers and the headers you should easily be at 200 and reading 180 at the rear wheels. Tons of torque and very streetable.

As the motor tires and/or you ambitions increase, start stock piling parts like cams and pistons. Making a 3.0 a ripping high performance engine is doable but, as you can see it doesn't come that cheap. Excellent block to start with IMHO.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike D.
post Feb 9 2007, 02:18 PM
Post #17


OK, It runs now, and pretty good too!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,448
Joined: 3-January 03
From: Santa Clarita, Ca
Member No.: 85
Region Association: None



Thanks all...

Eric, that is the exactly what I was going for. I can get it in the car for summer and start stock piling parts for a future rebuild. I probably only put around 3k miles per year on the 914 anyway so it should get me through a couple of years.

BTW, I committed to buy the engine this morning, so...

2.0 E spec six for sale (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) very low miles, very fun, come drive before you buy...

sorry, I'll take to the classifieds...
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th December 2024 - 09:56 AM