Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1973 Irish Green 2.0... Edit: "The Outed" Green Teen..., Anyone in NC have a chance to check this one out?
73Phoenix20
post Aug 24 2007, 09:40 AM
Post #61


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 15-June 05
From: Michiana
Member No.: 4,283



This just gets interestinger and interestinger !!!!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
por73914
post Aug 24 2007, 09:47 AM
Post #62


I don't know what the hell I am doing...
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 10-April 07
From: Fayetteville, AR
Member No.: 7,660



QUOTE(tod914 @ Aug 23 2007, 11:38 PM) *

I flew down to Atlanta alittle over 5 years ago to look at that car, as being sold by a private party. It was represented as an original 2.0 at the time. But, after some research, I discovered it was originally a 1.8. I was looking for a concours level car at the time. That car has alot of nos parts that George put on, which are certianly worth some money and are very appealing. Such as the complete interior and fuchs. The body in my opinion was in good shape. Certanialy not concours level. There was pinkish acid stains on the rear trunk lid, surface rust under the whole undercarriage, and the respray that George refered to previously. One of the bumpers, the front I believe was showing signs of rust through the rechrome. Engine had plenty of punch to it, although the accelerator cable was sticking. I can go into greater detail if someone is seriously interested in the car. I decided against it for a variety of reasons. Can't comment on it's current condition. Can only comment on it from what I recall from seeing back then. I believe I still have coorespondence saved in my emails on that one. Be very curious as to what they are asking for it.


How much was it 5 years ago?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
faster48
post Aug 24 2007, 10:10 AM
Post #63


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 6-October 06
From: Spring City, PA
Member No.: 7,001



I was told $30K and someone already has a deposit on it. They are oblivious to the incorrect stats and, by my impression, unconcerned.
Hopefully the gentleman flying in to look at the car knows what to look for...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pfierb
post Aug 24 2007, 10:10 AM
Post #64


oldest member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 606
Joined: 1-May 05
From: The sign of good government in Connecticut is to keep raising taxes
Member No.: 4,008



Such a ta do.... I really don't think there are too many that would kick that car out of bed.Sure is pretty looking.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
73Phoenix20
post Aug 24 2007, 11:16 AM
Post #65


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 15-June 05
From: Michiana
Member No.: 4,283



"Oblivious" and "Unconcerned"...

Sounds like used car sales types to me!!!

Let The Buyer Beware!

We still have yet to hear from a Legal Eagle as to the issues of a dealer knowingly misrepresenting the car... what is their liablity? I know that in most states, if the dealer sells you a car showing 3.7K and it turns out to have over 70K, they are going to be giving you your money back!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 24 2007, 11:51 AM
Post #66


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(tod914 @ Aug 23 2007, 09:38 PM) *

I flew down to Atlanta alittle over 5 years ago to look at that car, as being sold by a private party. It was represented as an original 2.0 at the time. But, after some research, I discovered it was originally a 1.8. I was looking for a concours level car at the time. That car has alot of nos parts that George put on, which are certianly worth some money and are very appealing. Such as the complete interior and fuchs. The body in my opinion was in good shape. Certanialy not concours level. There was pinkish acid stains on the rear trunk lid, surface rust under the whole undercarriage, and the respray that George refered to previously. One of the bumpers, the front I believe was showing signs of rust through the rechrome. Engine had plenty of punch to it, although the accelerator cable was sticking. I can go into greater detail if someone is seriously interested in the car. I decided against it for a variety of reasons. Can't comment on it's current condition. Can only comment on it from what I recall from seeing back then. I believe I still have coorespondence saved in my emails on that one. Be very curious as to what they are asking for it.


believe it or not that was a brand new factory bumper that we had installed on that car. I saw the flaw you are speaking of several years later after we sold it and was disappointed that the factory bumper did that. The under carriage is typical for a non undercoated southern car, some rust color throughout but not rot! That is par for the course on most of the even no mile 914s these days. It went to two owners after we sold it and they were obviously non Porsche concours enthusiasts, and did not give the car the attention it needed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 24 2007, 12:02 PM
Post #67


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Pat Garvey @ Aug 23 2007, 06:07 PM) *

I told the guy off!

Someone had to do it!
Pat


and you are good at that!!!! (JUST KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)[size=7][indent][size=7]
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 24 2007, 12:07 PM
Post #68


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Al Meredith @ Aug 23 2007, 07:50 PM) *

Hey Steve and George, My 1970 914-6 has on the "Karmann" plate the #23 . I was what my son Blake calls Blood Orange. Steve, your car is blood orange and you told me it was a #23. On the color chart that is linked to this thread there is no #23. Any comments???? Al


YES there is maybe 2310 same as 911 prefix color code. blood orange or tangerine. The factory painted many many sixes this color. Hey
Al when are you going to begin the restoration of your six?? If not there are many of us who would like to do your car!!!!!! (so to speak)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 24 2007, 12:26 PM
Post #69


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jamie @ Aug 23 2007, 07:53 PM) *

QUOTE(dr914@autoatlanta.com @ Aug 23 2007, 07:25 AM) *

QUOTE(levonfarra @ Aug 22 2007, 06:04 PM) *

73 had metal sills. 74 had black plastic.



good. But actually the jan 73 up cars had black plastic


My all original 02/73 has metal sills!



wow wow later than I had seen!!! the 05/73 and 06/73 1973 models on the lot BOTH have the black. Soo the question is when the change exactly. Many Many of the changes were made to the 914s on calendar change dates, meaning Jan 1 of the following year.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swl
post Aug 24 2007, 02:11 PM
Post #70


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



same on my new 02/73 yellow one. Aluminum. They have been removed at some point but look consistent with rest of the car. No reason to suspect that they are replacements.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
orthobiz
post Aug 24 2007, 03:38 PM
Post #71


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 8-January 07
From: Cadillac, Michigan
Member No.: 7,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Thanks for the compliment 73Phoenix20!!!

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
73Phoenix20
post Aug 24 2007, 03:42 PM
Post #72


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 15-June 05
From: Michiana
Member No.: 4,283



He, He! Never claimed to be an English Language student!!!

Just a student of fine Porsches!

And you are welcome! Best original one we have seen so far!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
black73
post Aug 24 2007, 04:30 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 516
Joined: 23-March 05
From: Nashville,TN
Member No.: 3,801
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Jamie @ Aug 23 2007, 08:53 PM) *

QUOTE(dr914@autoatlanta.com @ Aug 23 2007, 07:25 AM) *

QUOTE(levonfarra @ Aug 22 2007, 06:04 PM) *

73 had metal sills. 74 had black plastic.



good. But actually the jan 73 up cars had black plastic


My all original 02/73 has metal sills!


Yep, metal on my 2/73 also
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaminM3
post Aug 24 2007, 05:19 PM
Post #74


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: 23-March 07
From: SLC, UT
Member No.: 7,619
Region Association: Intermountain Region



This picture was on a Ebay listing last month that had claimed to be '73 original 2.0 and the manufacture date is 3/73.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jaminM3
post Aug 24 2007, 05:25 PM
Post #75


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: 23-March 07
From: SLC, UT
Member No.: 7,619
Region Association: Intermountain Region



This car is 5/73


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
73Phoenix20
post Aug 24 2007, 06:29 PM
Post #76


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 15-June 05
From: Michiana
Member No.: 4,283



...March 1973... Aluminum Sills...Attached Image

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 25 2007, 10:46 AM
Post #77


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



Just heard from Cam at the dealership, very nice guy, very concerned about listing the wrong info on the car. (It is indeed the same car we once had here) Chad said that he will post here and immediately correct the info. They wanted 35,000 for the car (which by any stretch is very high) but would now repost the car with the proper info and drop the price. For clarification, the car body and transmission has about 71,000 miles and Mary's 2.0 engine we installed, now has about 90,000 on it. (It was a factory rebuild put in the 1973 that she destroyed here in Atlanta back in 1985!, and at that time it had about 83,000 miles on it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
73Phoenix20
post Aug 25 2007, 11:34 AM
Post #78


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 15-June 05
From: Michiana
Member No.: 4,283



And We Have A Winnah!!!

$35,000.00... Amazing... pegged that one right on the money!

So for all of you folks that wanted into the Pool, just send $5.00 each to George, and I will be scheduling dinner with him for later this Fall!

Yep, Dickel Special Reserve, Porterhouse, Rare, Baked P, and fresh Peach Cobbler with real whipped cream!!! I can almost taste it!

Okay, second Pool is now open... How much will they have the balls to ask for the "outed" Green Teen???

Nope, I won't venture a guess on this one! It's all up to the rest of you!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914-8
post Aug 25 2007, 12:34 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 802
Joined: 23-January 06
From: Cal
Member No.: 5,461
Region Association: None



That's the problem with tampering with the mileage on a car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 25 2007, 02:25 PM
Post #80


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,900
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



Cam Just e mailed and said that they updated their website on the car: http://www.theaircooledguys.com/Inventory/...61/Default.aspx

Still got it wrong though!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

5 Pages V « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 06:17 AM