|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| JWest |
Jun 5 2009, 04:44 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 6-January 03 From: Fort Worth, TX Member No.: 97 Region Association: None
|
I've got a couple of Megasquirt 1 kits. You can have one if you want to go that path.
|
| Gint |
Jun 5 2009, 05:10 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,106 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
That would be awesome James. I can't take it for free though. I'll send a PM to discuss.
|
| wobbletop |
Jun 5 2009, 10:32 PM
Post
#43
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 382 Joined: 8-December 06 From: Ontario, Canada Member No.: 7,335 Region Association: Canada |
Sorry to thread hi-jack... I'm a newb, but I have a 3.0L that has been converted to carbs. I'd love to be able to convert it to a modern FI system, but wouldn't have a clue where to start.
Anyone have any links that would get me started? Should I be looking in the 911 forums instead? Thanks. |
| zymurgist |
Jun 6 2009, 07:26 AM
Post
#44
|
|
"Ace" Mechanic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,411 Joined: 9-June 05 From: Hagerstown, MD Member No.: 4,238 Region Association: None |
You might want to start a new thread on that topic...
I'm no expert on the Porsche flat-6, but you need to find out (if you don't already know) what cams are installed on your engine. I'm pretty sure that CIS cams are different from cams that would be used with carbs. |
| Gint |
Jun 6 2009, 08:24 AM
Post
#45
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,106 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) A little more specialized and I'd like to keep this thread focused on the 4 cylinder.
|
| DNHunt |
Jun 6 2009, 10:00 AM
Post
#46
|
|
914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,099 Joined: 21-April 03 From: Gig Harbor, WA Member No.: 598 |
I've now worked with MS1, MS2 and SDS. I've now run all tree for quite awhile over the years and all three have survived long road trips (2000 + miles each). The cheapest is MS1 and it will work pretty darn well. I ran it doing fuel only and used a Pertronix triggering an MSD 6a for ignition on a 2056. I enjoyed that. I felt it had more low end torque but, I couldn't prove it. I did have it dynoed and the guy who did that coaxed a couple more hp out of it so, I think road tuning probably leaves a little performance on the table.
As McMark said earlier, the harness is the real challenge with either MS. When I had failures and I did like crapping out in rush hour traffic a couple of times it was always harness or connector related. Once I broke a wire and the other time the connector came loose. There is shielding that needs to be done and I think MS is more susceptible to electromagnetic interference than SDS, but, it can be overcome. My only complaint with the system is the correction for intake air temperature. It is extrapolated from 3 resistance, temperature pairs and I found that the air fuel mixtures varied with temperature because of that. The intake air temp in my setup would really vary as the sensor was in the plenum in the stock location and it was subject to heat soak. So, whether the correction was off because of the location of the sensor or the table generated by the program, it was off. MS, either one, is a tinker's dream. I found I was always getting my laptop out and messing with it cause there was always something new to try. That's not necessarily bad but you got to like that kind of stuff. If I wanted cheap, I'd find a 2 liter intake, get 1.8 injectors cause they have much better connectors and new connectors to fit them are available (they will put out plenty of fuel). I'd move the intake air sensor to the snorkel. I'd go to a pick and pull and find a workable TPS. I'd use the stock AAR for warmup. I'd buy a MS1 kit and a relay board and start soldering. Then I would schedule a bunch of time to tinker with it and tune it. It will cost more than you plan on unless you work with someone who has done this before. Plan on some dyno time with a tuner if you can. I think the trade off is your money or your time. I think MS works and probably just as well as most systems, I just think it is way more work. Dave |
| Gint |
Jun 6 2009, 10:42 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,106 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Thanks Dave. Harness huh... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) I've heard that twice now. I hadn't thought about it that much yet. Hmmm...
I can be anal about wiring. I don't love it, but I can do it. At least if I'm building my own I'll know what I have. This post has been edited by Gint: Jun 6 2009, 10:45 PM |
| sww914 |
Jun 6 2009, 10:51 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,439 Joined: 4-June 06 Member No.: 6,146 Region Association: None |
Thanks for starting a great thread. Long overdue in hindsight.
|
| Phoenix-MN |
Jun 7 2009, 08:29 AM
Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 927 Joined: 23-January 04 From: ST. Bonifacius,MN Member No.: 1,590 |
|
| r_towle |
Jun 7 2009, 10:06 AM
Post
#50
|
|
Custom Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24,705 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States
|
Sorry to thread hi-jack... I'm a newb, but I have a 3.0L that has been converted to carbs. I'd love to be able to convert it to a modern FI system, but wouldn't have a clue where to start. Anyone have any links that would get me started? Should I be looking in the 911 forums instead? Thanks. Contact Autosport Engineering in Stow MA. A porsche shop. They have designed and built a bolt on setup to bring 911's back to FI. Rich |
| lotus_65 |
Jun 7 2009, 10:38 AM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,609 Joined: 21-March 05 From: minneapolis, mn Member No.: 3,795 Region Association: Northstar Region |
Sorry to thread hi-jack... I'm a newb, but I have a 3.0L that has been converted to carbs. I'd love to be able to convert it to a modern FI system, but wouldn't have a clue where to start. Anyone have any links that would get me started? Should I be looking in the 911 forums instead? Thanks. Contact Autosport Engineering in Stow MA. A porsche shop. They have designed and built a bolt on setup to bring 911's back to FI. Rich thats cool, too bad the return probably isn't there to do it for the T-IV's! |
| puff adder |
Jun 7 2009, 10:44 AM
Post
#52
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 9-December 08 From: northern california Member No.: 9,827 Region Association: None |
I found this company while looking for ITB's for my car.
Modular, can be configured for just about anything, and a LOT less than anything else available. They're called "extrudabody". They also have intersting manifolds and adaptors. I posted in the link thread also by accident. |
| crash914 |
Jun 7 2009, 11:05 AM
Post
#53
|
|
its a mystery to me ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,830 Joined: 17-March 03 From: Marriottsville, MD Member No.: 434 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I have also ran mine as a piggy back system on the stock 2L set up.
fuel only, stock manifold and intake, I made new connectors for the FI injectors and plugged into the ms. I don't remember what I did about the tps, either i mounted a new one in place of the stock or did not use it. Ran it this way for some time. no major problems were encountered. if I did, i could just plug back in the stock system...easy... |
| Cevan |
Jun 7 2009, 11:16 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,079 Joined: 11-December 06 From: Western Massachusetts Member No.: 7,351 |
If I wanted cheap, I'd find a 2 liter intake, get 1.8 injectors cause they have much better connectors and new connectors to fit them are available (they will put out plenty of fuel). I'd move the intake air sensor to the snorkel. I'd go to a pick and pull and find a workable TPS. I'd use the stock AAR for warmup. I'd buy a MS1 kit and a relay board and start soldering. Then I would schedule a bunch of time to tinker with it and tune it. It will cost more than you plan on unless you work with someone who has done this before. Plan on some dyno time with a tuner if you can. I think the trade off is your money or your time. I think MS works and probably just as well as most systems, I just think it is way more work. Dave In that case, why not just find a working L-Jet setup. They can't be more than $250-300. ECU's and AFMs rarely fail, so if you're using 1.8 injectors, TPS and an AAR, what else is left but the harness? |
| charliew |
Jun 7 2009, 11:26 AM
Post
#55
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,363 Joined: 31-July 07 From: Crawford, TX. Member No.: 7,958 |
It's the programming for the different motor configurations that the aftermarket stuff works better over factory ecus. You can always improve performance if the individual motor is custom tuned.
|
| Gint |
Jun 8 2009, 08:01 AM
Post
#56
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,106 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
So, I'm thinking that the way to do this might be something like this. Just spitballin here...
|
| Gint |
Jun 8 2009, 08:02 AM
Post
#57
|
|
Mike Ginter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,106 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
How about it? Anyone have any experience with it? |
| underthetire |
Jun 8 2009, 09:41 AM
Post
#58
|
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,062 Joined: 7-October 08 From: Brentwood Member No.: 9,623 Region Association: Northern California |
Think it's pretty much the same as the MS2. Just in a smaller package. Not repairable at home because of the surface mount components. I'm running MS2 with coil control. Its takes playing around with it and be prepared to learn. You can not just solder it together and go. Download the manual now and read up on it. Then decide. I did mine in stages as well, first just fuel, now i'm doing ignition. Next step is a modern throttle body with air regulator control for the idle circuit. I am using all GM sensors ( most of it is Bosch anyway) with the stock 1.7 injectors. Get the MS2 or Micro for stock injectors, you won't need the resistors for the low impedance injectors. Also the MS2 gives you a lot more options for ignition. The wire harness is available or I made my own in a few hours.
Be prepared for additional costs either way, you will need connectors for the sensors and the sensors themselves. If you need help with connectors, just PM me, my neighbor has 5 five gallon cans full of stock GM connectors. I'm sure we could dig something up. Good luck |
| jd74914 |
Jun 8 2009, 11:22 AM
Post
#59
|
|
Its alive ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,875 Joined: 16-February 04 From: CT Member No.: 1,659 Region Association: North East States |
I've used Microsquirt. Its not too difficult to learn, but as stated you cannot change out components. I don't really have experience with any other PEFI so I have nothing to base the experience off of, but I would definately use it again.
The only part I didn't like was that the computer could only support 2 fuel and ignition outputs. I would have prefered 4 for sequential injection/ignition, but batch fire works fine too. I used it on a bike motor, and the only other annoying feature was that I couldn't get it to read the stock Honda cam position sensor. Since you are limited to batch firing anyways that wasn't a big deal. It only took 1 or 2 more rotations to sync. |
| McMark |
Jun 8 2009, 12:44 PM
Post
#60
|
|
914 Freak! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,180 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
The system I have been posting about uses MicroSquirt. I LOVE it.
The motor it's on runs, but still needs a few tweaks. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 10:01 AM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |