SirAndy
Jun 29 2007, 10:37 PM
QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ Jun 29 2007, 08:33 PM)
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 29 2007, 07:16 PM)
~180 miles roundtrip @ ~6 gallons of gas, that comes out to ~30 mpg ...
Andy
I thought the hoses were for brake bleeding. Now I get it.......The hoses are returning the fuel back to the tank instead of using it!
1 feedline, 4 return lines and injectors plugged!
Andy
por73914
Jul 10 2007, 02:50 PM
AMAZING
GaroldShaffer
Jul 10 2007, 03:10 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 25 2007, 03:30 PM)
a few more pics, this was at McMark's shop on thursday before the WCR ... talk about last minute ...
McMark and Tim installing the custom intake boot (elbow is from a mustang):
Click to view attachment Andy
Looks great Andy. Also looks like you need one of Mom service covers
McMark
Jul 10 2007, 07:16 PM
Only after the nice paint goes on.
Allan
Jul 10 2007, 07:39 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 29 2007, 06:16 PM)
PS: while driving, the temps stay right around 180. while sitting intraffic in the central valley heat, it went up to 200 ...
not bad at all.
I run my 2.7 (Iknow it's meek) at 210 all day.
I think you occasionally need to burn off the moisture...
jimkelly
Jul 16 2007, 06:34 PM
awesome ride
almost as nice as mine
SirAndy
Jul 16 2007, 06:42 PM
QUOTE(jimkelly @ Jul 16 2007, 04:34 PM)
awesome ride
thank you sir ...
i took her to the car wash yesterday and gave her a nice cleaning and waxing ...
Andy
JPB
Jul 16 2007, 06:47 PM
Andy candy, Kelly candy. Crap I needs me somadat candy to.
Eddie914
Jul 16 2007, 06:56 PM
Andy,
FABULOUS JOB! You too McMark!
I did not see any pics of the ducting for front oil cooler. Did I miss the pics in the 13 pages of postings?
My poor little 3.2 now seems so meager compared to your big burley 3.6!
1800 lbs! Wow! That is skinny with the 3.6. I must have heavy gas in the tank in my teener. My teener is still about 2050 lbs with fiberglass decks and front fenders.
Great Job!
Eddie
SirAndy
Jul 18 2007, 06:20 PM
QUOTE(Eddie914 @ Jul 16 2007, 04:56 PM)
I did not see any pics of the ducting for front oil cooler. Did I miss the pics in the 13 pages of postings?
no, you didn't ... no ducting as of yet. didn't have time to get it done and decided to just drive it for now. i took the two round plugs out of the trunk floor, so i get some air circulation.
the ducting will be tackled this winter ...
Andy
SirAndy
Jul 25 2007, 10:17 PM
SirAndy
Jul 25 2007, 10:18 PM
new clutch, pressureplate (thanks paul!
) and custom ringgear:
custom tool i made to remove/install the ball socket for the clutch lever pivot. 14mm socket that needs to be ground down to fit.
and installed
:
Andy
SirAndy
Jul 25 2007, 10:21 PM
new 993 combo gauge. now i got the right gauge for the oil sending units. also hooked up the "check engine" light ...
wired and ready to go:
Click to view attachmentfuzzy closeup of them warning lights:
Click to view attachment Andy
IronHillRestorations
Jul 26 2007, 08:43 AM
Very cool. But don't you have too much power with that 3.6??
thesey914
Jul 26 2007, 10:58 AM
So Andy, you now have the late push (pull?) type clutch with flat flywheel and bolted on starter ring? Is that the only mod you have to make, repositioning the pivot ball? Any mods to the cable?
SirAndy
Jul 26 2007, 12:32 PM
QUOTE(thesey914 @ Jul 26 2007, 08:58 AM)
So Andy, you now have the late push (pull?) type clutch with flat flywheel and bolted on starter ring? Is that the only mod you have to make, repositioning the pivot ball? Any mods to the cable?
no, it's not a 911 style pressure plate. it works just like the stock 914 PP, so no modifications needed at all.
i only had to add a shim to the pivot ball for throw adjustment on the lever ...
Andy
jonferns
Jul 27 2007, 05:21 PM
QUOTE
Very cool. But don't you have too much power with that 3.6??
you can
never have too much power...right?
-JON
Tobra
Dec 24 2009, 09:24 PM
QUOTE(sendjonathanmail @ Jul 27 2007, 04:21 PM)
QUOTE
Very cool. But don't you have too much power with that 3.6??
you can
never have too much power...right?
-JON
I never heard someone say, "I wish it had less power."
Mark Donahue said if you can leave two black marks from where you start accelerating to braking zone you have enough power. You put 300 hp in a 1800 lb car, I would expect it to be interesting.
Oh yeah, Merry Christmas
scotty b
Dec 24 2009, 10:05 PM
Finally we see the reason behind Andy's fuzzy pics. Lay off the juice man, you've got the jitters !!
iamchappy
Dec 24 2009, 10:09 PM
I too have some clutch holding problems as horsepower builds with the turbo, I was thinking of trying a Kevlar clutch before having to step up to a stage 3 pressure plate, Andy are you using a stage 2 pp? if not what........
SirAndy
Dec 25 2009, 12:21 PM
QUOTE(iamchappy @ Dec 24 2009, 08:09 PM)
I too have some clutch holding problems as horsepower builds with the turbo, I was thinking of trying a Kevlar clutch before having to step up to a stage 3 pressure plate, Andy are you using a stage 2 pp? if not what........
KEP Stage II
http://www.kennedyeng.com/porsc_pp.htmSo far, so good. Supposedly good for ~350HP and ~275 ftlb of torque ...
Andy
iamchappy
Dec 25 2009, 02:11 PM
The Kep stage 2 wont hold mine, mostly in 5th, Kevlar clutches supposably can hold
more horsepower so that maybe the option i will try.
PRS914-6
Dec 25 2009, 04:23 PM
I'm no expert but there is a big difference in a disk built to last (Kevlar) and one that is built to take torque. I suspect the Kevlar is indestructible but may not offer the best coefficient of friction to prevent the slippage.
Call Brett at Kennedy Engineering and ask about the race fabric that has more metal in it. The disk will be a little harder on the flywheel and pressure plate but the additional metal fibers make it grip better without adding a heavy pressure plate to prevent the slippage. It's what I used on mine with a stock 915 pressure plate and it does not slip at all under anything I throw at it.
iamchappy
Dec 25 2009, 05:23 PM
I've talked to Brett at Kennedy his move is for me to send him my pressure plate and tweak it to something like a stage 2.5 or go to a 3
I have also talked to Renegade who use the Kevlar clutches exclusively on there V8 conversions because they say they can hold over 30% more HP.
I'm surprised your stage 2's can handle the torque, i would of thought that your 3.6's would have more torque than my 3.1 turbo. The turbo engine has more horsepower than you have with the 3.6's but i dont think it has as much torque.
This is from the Renegade website:
CLUTCHES
Infinite hours of testing are invested into our products. In the quest for more power, we burned up clutches, roasted flywheels, and tested the abilities of our best pressure plates, all in the name of a "streetable" clutch package. Many unsuccessful combinations were attempted before we came up with the right solution.
We found that the Porsche clutch disc, using a Kevlar facing, works extremely well and remains very acceptable for a daily driver. The Kevlar friction material increases holding power 30-40% over standard materials.
KEVLAR CLUTCH DISCS
Kevlar is one of the newest editions to the vast array of materials used to surface a clutch disc. While we offer just about any material for any application, the Kevlar, in most cases, is the best all around choice for a combination of street and track use.
NOTE: Proper break-in is a must with this material. Misuse or abuse during break-in will cause chatter and limited holding characteristics. Up to 500 miles of very mild engagement and limited compression braking is required to "seat" this material. Once it's properly broken-in, the overall performance will be second to none
PRS914-6
Dec 25 2009, 06:39 PM
Actually, my pressure plate is stock (915) but I don't know how it compares to a Kennedy Stage 2 901. When I talked to Brett I told him I did not want a heavy feeling clutch and wanted no part of a heavy duty pressure plate. I find that very annoying in a street car.
He steered me to this special fabric with more metal and claimed it would do the job and far exceed organic disks. Even with my posi 915, I can stand on it without a problem with a chipped 3.6. I'm pretty happy with it. They rivet and glue the fabric on a disk and it results in a slightly thicker disk and they have to machine the pressure plate a little to make up for it.
Brett would know better than I if the disk he sold me is better or worse than Kevlar for torque capacity. I would pose that question directly to him.
iamchappy
Dec 25 2009, 06:53 PM
Brett doesn't like Kevlar disc's mostly for the break in, if not done right there easy to burn up self destruct and wont hold at all.
if done right i believe there suppose to hold better are less abrasive and last longer than organic.
I have talked to a couple of guys running them in there huge horsepower turbo 911's
who swear them.
Renegades Kevlar 9" clutch sells for under 200.00 and i think it's worth a try, if i get one, i will post my observations this Spring or Summer
when i get back on the road.
-JR-
Jun 17 2010, 10:23 PM
Andy, any chance you can elaborate on a couple things?
I can't find anywhere that you talked about mounting the flywheel pickup. It looks like you have some special bracket and then cut the trans bell housing to accomodate it. What happend there?
The drive axles...
You mentioned you used 944 CV's, what year / type? (S2/turbo/standard)
"Early 911 hubs" Any idea of the part number or exact years and
did these fit the 914 hub bearings?
Dito for the stub axels
When you say "modified" 914 shafts, what did that entail?
"later 911 flanges" would that of come from a 915 trans?
Thanks!
SirAndy
Jun 17 2010, 10:39 PM
QUOTE(-JR- @ Jun 17 2010, 09:23 PM)
any chance you can elaborate on a couple things?
I assume you're talking about the sensor on the flywheel. In which case the bracket is stock 993. All i did was to notch the 901 bellhousing in the right place for the sensor.
As for the 944 axle conversion, there's a thread with all the details in the classics forum ...
Andy
PRS914-6
Jun 17 2010, 10:53 PM
An FYI....The conversion flywheel is smaller than a 993 making the sensor gap too big unless you machine the bracket for the sensor to drop deeper...see pictures
Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment
SirAndy
Jun 18 2010, 10:59 AM
QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ Jun 17 2010, 09:53 PM)
An FYI....The conversion flywheel is smaller than a 993 making the sensor gap too big unless you machine the bracket for the sensor to drop deeper...see pictures
Mine worked just fine ...
I set the gap to the factory specs and the adjustment on the stock bracket was more than enough. No machining needed.
Andy
PRS914-6
Jun 18 2010, 12:25 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 18 2010, 09:59 AM)
QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ Jun 17 2010, 09:53 PM)
An FYI....The conversion flywheel is smaller than a 993 making the sensor gap too big unless you machine the bracket for the sensor to drop deeper...see pictures
Mine worked just fine ...
I set the gap to the factory specs and the adjustment on the stock bracket was more than enough. No machining needed.
Andy
My recollection is that I removed about .060 off the bracket. The holes in the bracket are large enough to move some but not nearly enough for mine to get close enough to the smaller flywheel. Bottom line, it's a setting that needs to be accurate for sure. Some people drill the holes larger in the bracket to gain a little movement. If you don't have to cut anything, better yet....
-JR-
Jun 19 2010, 01:18 AM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 17 2010, 09:39 PM)
I assume you're talking about the sensor on the flywheel. In which case the bracket is stock 993. All i did was to notch the 901 bellhousing in the right place for the sensor.
As for the 944 axle conversion, there's a thread with all the details in the classics forum ...
Andy
Thanks Andy, I think I figured it out. My engine had no such bracket and I think this bracket only is installed on manual transmission cars. My engine came from a tiptronic car.
Found the axel article.
Had no idea that the "classic" forum had all the stuff in there.
SirAndy
Mar 22 2013, 12:15 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Apr 25 2007, 09:46 PM)
... here's the current "todo" list ...
- Fabricate oil cooler exit ducting
Wow, it's only been 6 years since the post above.
Well, i finally decided to have
McMark put in some time to make me an original custom oil cooler duct.
The shroud is removable which allows for storing stuff like my toolbox behind it.
Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment
Cairo94507
Mar 22 2013, 12:39 PM
that looks very nice Andy.
SirAndy
Mar 22 2013, 04:53 PM
QUOTE(Cairo94507 @ Mar 22 2013, 11:39 AM)
that looks very nice Andy.
Haven't seen it yet in person and i'm also waiting to see what the louvers in the hood look like.
I'm excited about having proper air-flow now which should cut down on some of the heat issues i had.
r_towle
Mar 22 2013, 04:55 PM
Curious if that will blow alot of hot air on your head with the top off.
rich
SirAndy
Mar 22 2013, 04:56 PM
QUOTE(r_towle @ Mar 22 2013, 03:55 PM)
Curious if that will blow alot of hot air on your head with the top off.
Poor mans heater for those bitter cold CA mornings ...
76-914
Mar 22 2013, 05:01 PM
Nothing some well placed vortex generators couldn't correct.
Madswede
Mar 22 2013, 05:03 PM
Sweeeeeet!
Krieger
Mar 22 2013, 05:20 PM
Looks great. Can't wait to see the hood.
Krieger
Mar 22 2013, 05:40 PM
QUOTE(76-914 @ Mar 22 2013, 04:01 PM)
Nothing some well placed vortex generators couldn't correct.
Andy's Mohawk counts as a vortex generator doesn't it?
Spoke
Mar 22 2013, 07:44 PM
Nice ducting.
2 questions:
1) is the ducting removable for access to the battery box?
2) What did/are you doing for exit onto the hood?
SirAndy
Mar 22 2013, 07:54 PM
QUOTE(Spoke @ Mar 22 2013, 06:44 PM)
2 questions:
1) is the ducting removable for access to the battery box?
2) What did/are you doing for exit onto the hood?
1 - Yes, no. Yes, it's removable, no, it's not a battery box, it's my toolbox.
2 - Je ne sais pas. That'll be a original customs surprise.
The whole piece is build to be easily removed. It just drops in from the top and anchors to the cooler in the front and the firewall in the back.
Once the hood is closed, it's held in place by the frame of the hood.
bulitt
Jul 21 2013, 04:58 PM
ing this thread to see if Andy has pics of his hood cut for the oil cooler
ducting?
r_towle
Jul 21 2013, 06:41 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Mar 22 2013, 09:54 PM)
QUOTE(Spoke @ Mar 22 2013, 06:44 PM)
2 questions:
1) is the ducting removable for access to the battery box?
2) What did/are you doing for exit onto the hood?
1 - Yes, no. Yes, it's removable, no, it's not a battery box, it's my toolbox.
2 - Je ne sais pas. That'll be a original customs surprise.
The whole piece is build to be easily removed. It just drops in from the top and anchors to the cooler in the front and the firewall in the back.
Once the hood is closed, it's held in place by the frame of the hood.
Hinged so it flips forward.....then you don't need to find a place to put it on the ground...
Just saying
SirAndy
Jul 21 2013, 08:00 PM
QUOTE(bulitt @ Jul 21 2013, 03:58 PM)
ing this thread to see if Andy has pics of his hood cut for the oil cooler
ducting?
I'm going to take the car to work tomorrow, i'll post some pics then.
It's a bit "rough" but works very well ...
rick 918-S
Jul 22 2013, 08:41 AM
SirAndy
Jul 22 2013, 11:50 PM
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jul 21 2013, 07:00 PM)
It's a bit "rough" but works very well ...
Alright, as promised, here are the pix ...
View from the front
Click to view attachmentView from the top
Click to view attachmentThe shroud in place
Click to view attachmentThe hood from the underside
Click to view attachmentThe shroud removed
Click to view attachmentThe shroud
Click to view attachmentSince this hood is all bend up anyways, we just went ahead and cut the louvers directly into the hood.
The final design will have a nice stamped (or FG) louvered section.
As mentioned before, the shroud is slid into position from the top and is only held in place by the closed hood.
It's very simply to take out (just lift it up).
The improvement in cooling is almost too much (see my other thread about the car not getting up to operating temp).
I also noticed a significant improvement in high speed stability, i'm guessing due to less air under the car and added downforce from the out the hood design.
bulitt
Jul 23 2013, 03:02 AM
Nice. Mini-ferrari type set up. The 308's and 512's didnt have a shroud, the front trunk bulkhead just acted as a wall to direct air up through the louvers, and as you did- Ferrari just used a strip of foam to seal the area. I would think the shroud will keep water out of the trunk to some extent, if you ever drive in the rain. I may go this route to vent my radiator and keep the wheel structure intact. Have a spare hood to mess with.
Thanks for posting.
pcar916
Jul 23 2013, 06:58 AM
This was fun to read! I should've taken a lot more pictures while building through all of the various stages. I have lots from specific mods but an entire timeline would've been a lot more interesting.
Note to self... next time stop long enough to take more pix along the way. It's just such a PITA to repeatedly stop working, clean up enough not to turn your camera into a greaseball, and get back to it.
Second note to self: Invite friends to build with me, looks a lot more interesting. And there would have been more beer after each day's work.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.