Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 01:43 PM
Here it is. Total seperation
Let's talk about it
KT
Andyrew
Apr 24 2006, 01:47 PM
Ouch!
looks like bad weld penetration right there...
two pieces of metal should never break right on the weld.. if it was welded correctly....
Part Pricer
Apr 24 2006, 01:51 PM
So we can be sure that we're looking at the same thing, this is the same mount right?
LvSteveH
Apr 24 2006, 01:56 PM
They are way too big to be having stuff like this happen, and on multiple occasions no less. It's so much better to over engineer and over build from a safety and liability standpoint. Not to mention reputation.
In this case, the execution is very poor. They probably welded it and ground it clean for appearance. The initial weld didn't penetrate, and they cleaned off the only part that had any strength to it. On a structural application, I would be very reluctant to grind a weld for the sake of appearance. To me there is nothing prettier than a nice, clean, properly laid weld. That entire seam should have been welded on one side, with at least 1" welds spaced 1" apart on the other side. Personally, I'd weld it on both sides if there is room.
There is absolutely no excuse for that.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:01 PM
Nope, the other one.
KT
john rogers
Apr 24 2006, 02:03 PM
Did both sides rip loose. That is the first one of his new ones I have seem fail as a lot of the vintage racers are using them and no failures so far.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:05 PM
here's the bar from the website
KT
Series9
Apr 24 2006, 02:08 PM
Do you know the year yours was made?
Mine is the 'newer model', but I do keep an eye on it.
Series9
Apr 24 2006, 02:14 PM
I have a couple of ideas to reinforce it. I may need to do so on mine someday.
If you send it to me, I'll fix it for you for free.
nine14cats
Apr 24 2006, 02:15 PM
Trekkor bought this mount from me. It is the new style that Jim Patrick sold to me to cure my previous issues with the older bar.
The failure looks the same as my original failure.
Sorry Trek.....
As John says, this is the first of the new style mounts that I have heard about failing.
It's hard to believe that it would be overstressed with the torque of your 2.0/2.2 liter. Something else caused this.
Bill P.
iamchappy
Apr 24 2006, 02:18 PM
Those quick mounts have had a history of breaking.
lapuwali
Apr 24 2006, 02:20 PM
Gee, that looks like I welded it...
It's strange that there's even a weld there. A stronger, and cheaper, way to fabricate that part would be to have the whole part other than the bar made as one pressed piece. This would be very unlikely to break, and even if the welds to attach it to the bar broke, they'd be resting on the bar. Lots of clunking noises, but nothing would fall down.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:26 PM
I don't know the year. But it is a total failure.
More pics...
Engman
Apr 24 2006, 02:28 PM
Paging Mike Z.
Paging Mike Z.
M
Series9
Apr 24 2006, 02:30 PM
There no penetration in that weld.
Seriously, send it to me. I'd like to give it a try.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:34 PM
I've been looking foward to Mikey's pleasant and dignified response to this since it happened.
Pretty sad when you are under a car and see this and the first thing that pops into your head is "Zois". ( in the Seinfeld voice, just like when he says, "Newman" )
KT
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:37 PM
Thanks Joe, I'll keep you in mind. really nice of you.
My buddy might just be willing to drive up with his truck mounted welding rig and fix it on site. : welder:
It has to come out of the car to be repaired properly, I can see that very clearly.
KT
LvSteveH
Apr 24 2006, 02:38 PM
My laptop screen isn't the best, but it looks like it was welded on the inside. A nice filet weld around there should be super strong, someone just had no idea what they were doing. That's one of the dangerous things about Mig, it can look ok, and have no strength to it. When you are welding, it's plain as day when you get good penetration if you know what to look for. I don't think it needs to be beefed up so much as done properly.
on edit: I'd like to see them use a little thicker plate too, if we're being picky.
Series9
Apr 24 2006, 02:39 PM
I just emailed pictures to Jim.
We'll see what happens.
Series9
Apr 24 2006, 02:42 PM
Besides just welding, it should be stress relieved in an oven.
I have access to an oven that could do the job.
nine14cats
Apr 24 2006, 02:45 PM
Trekkor,
This failure is much worse than mine was. I still had weld contact on the bar. Your's is a complete failure.
Glad to hear you are thinking of taking it out. You won't be able to do it right in the car. Pull the motor and clean it up.
Bummer dude....
Bill P.
SirAndy
Apr 24 2006, 02:49 PM
QUOTE(Part Pricer @ Apr 24 2006, 12:51 PM)
So we can be sure that we're looking at the same thing, this is the same mount right?
nope, your picture is the new bulkhead mount, trekkor has the mount bar that uses the stock /4 motor mount points ...
Andy
McMark
Apr 24 2006, 02:52 PM
Duct TAPE!
Sucks Trekkor. I'm sure the fixed version will work fine.
You need a smaller motor.
Build a nice 1600 cc six cylinder.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 02:53 PM
QUOTE
I just emailed pictures to Jim.
Me too...
wonder what they're talking about?
I called them a couple of hours ago.
KT
jhadler
Apr 24 2006, 03:00 PM
QUOTE(trekkor @ Apr 24 2006, 12:53 PM)
QUOTE
I just emailed pictures to Jim.
Me too...
wonder what they're talking about?
I called them a couple of hours ago.
KT
If they're a good shop, they're probably talking about how to make you happy. Maybe offering to ship you a new bar and help pay for installation at a shop maybe? Just a guess, but a new bar should be on the table I'd think. That's not just a minor crack or anything. That's a near-miss lawsuit. A new mount would be a lot cheaper than a court date...
Only catch is you didn't buy it from them... Hmmm, tough one...
Trekkor, that sucks. It's a good thing it landed on the shift linkage, I hate to think what would have happened if it got all the way loose...
-Josh2
SirAndy
Apr 24 2006, 03:06 PM
QUOTE(jhadler @ Apr 24 2006, 02:00 PM)
I hate to think what would have happened if it got all the way loose...
the tranny "ears" will snap off and the whole combo falls down on the concrete, the front of the motor get's stuck on one of the seams between the concrete slabs and your axles and rear suspension get ripped off the tub, that back of the car is going to jump high up in the air and the car comes down to a halt about 30 feet in front of your engine, transmission and axles.
Andy
jhadler
Apr 24 2006, 03:10 PM
Wow Andy, that's a pretty vivid description... I take it it's a first hand experience?
-Josh2
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Apr 24 2006, 01:06 PM)
QUOTE(jhadler @ Apr 24 2006, 02:00 PM)
I hate to think what would have happened if it got all the way loose...
the tranny "ears" will snap off and the whole combo falls down on the concrete, the front of the motor get's stuck on one of the seams between the concrete slabs and your axles and rear suspension get ripped off the tub, that back of the car is going to jump high up in the air and the car comes down to a halt about 30 feet in front of your engine, transmission and axles.
Andy
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 03:12 PM
That would have been "a problem".
"Alameda, we have a problem".
I'm thinking about working on it NOW, as it is just hanging there on the trailer.
KT
SirAndy
Apr 24 2006, 03:18 PM
QUOTE(jhadler @ Apr 24 2006, 02:10 PM)
Wow Andy, that's a pretty vivid description... I take it it's a first hand experience?
not myself (i was just a spectator) and not a 914, but other than that, that's *exactly* what it looked like ...
Andy
Porcharu
Apr 24 2006, 03:21 PM
Where are the welds? Looks like they forgot to weld it up. I just fixed a goof I made on my tubing bender that only involved 4 inches of weld and it was a major PITA to get those 2 pieces of steel separated. Lots of grinding and pounding with a BFH
QUOTE(trekkor @ Apr 24 2006, 01:26 PM)
I don't know the year. But it is a total failure.
More pics...
john rogers
Apr 24 2006, 03:31 PM
I read the posts through several times and am still confused? Is this the early mount that uses the 4 cylinder mount ears or the later one that bolts to the bulkhead? The early design was flawed due to the long/bent tubes that allow the engine to twist and move and it is worse on a track car since the rear part of the car where the tranny is bolted is moving too. If it was the early one, I'd get rid of it.
As a side note, when the shop put the six in my race car, we used an empty 2L block and tranny to test fit things. When doing this the trand mounts were found to be off about 5/16 inch to one side and were modified so the engine was bolted in with no stress on the mounts, front and rear. You might want to consider checking that when things get calmed down and you have some time?
So.Cal.914
Apr 24 2006, 03:38 PM
Dude!
I can not believe they let that mount out of the shop
like that. Your really lucky that nothing worse happened, you must
have been
four leaf clovers when that happened.
That's just wrong...
nine14cats
Apr 24 2006, 03:46 PM
John,
Trekkor bought the mount in his car from me. It is the 2nd generation crossbar mount that supposedly addressed the cracking issue of the Gen I crossbar mounts. I had rewelded the old Gen I mount and was still running it in our old 914-6 when I sold it. Jim Patrick had given me a discount on the Gen II crossbar mount because he did not like the welding being done on the Gen I mount as per Demick's explaination.
I also bought the PMS bulkhead mount and would have sold that to Trekkor when I bought The Beast (which has the RJ mount already), but I had sold the bulkhead mount and I had not found any mention of failures with the Gen II mounts.
I'm just blown away that the whole mount came undone.
Bill P.
DanT
Apr 24 2006, 03:54 PM
And how was it again, that the factory 6 engine mount was attached????
What was that, did someone say bulkhead?
Rand
Apr 24 2006, 04:04 PM
I don't understand why the idea of upgrading to a bulkhead mount keeps getting brushed off either. Is there a disadvantage to it?
Cap'n Krusty
Apr 24 2006, 04:04 PM
QUOTE(jhadler @ Apr 24 2006, 02:00 PM)
QUOTE(trekkor @ Apr 24 2006, 12:53 PM)
QUOTE
I just emailed pictures to Jim.
Me too...
wonder what they're talking about?
I called them a couple of hours ago.
KT
If they're a good shop, they're probably talking about how to make you happy. Maybe offering to ship you a new bar and help pay for installation at a shop maybe? Just a guess, but a new bar should be on the table I'd think. That's not just a minor crack or anything. That's a near-miss lawsuit. A new mount would be a lot cheaper than a court date...
Only catch is you didn't buy it from them... Hmmm, tough one...
Trekkor, that sucks. It's a good thing it landed on the shift linkage, I hate to think what would have happened if it got all the way loose...
-Josh2
"If they're a good shop .....................". That has NOT been the case in past failures. They pulled a "Permadoom" and told the unfortunate victim to take a hike. The Cap'n
J P Stein
Apr 24 2006, 04:05 PM
Guys, come on.........
I did my 6 conversion in about 98....pre internet days for me.
At the time, it was widely held that NONE of the bar type mounts
were worth a shit. I had to get a Vellious bulkhead mount as RJ didn't have his done yet.....and wouldn't settle for less NOW......the effin' internet didn't fix them fuchin' pieces of crap......just more bullshit for the acceptability of them.
Zois is not always right, but he's spot on with these.....IMO.
The good news is he's not one to say "I told you so"
Aaron Cox
Apr 24 2006, 04:06 PM
QUOTE(Rand @ Apr 24 2006, 03:04 PM)
I don't understand why the idea of upgrading to a bulkhead mount keeps getting brushed off either. Is there a disadvantage to it?
it takes work and costs more, but is clearly the right solution
(LOL....)
rich johnson or patrick bulkhead
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 04:14 PM
Jim Patrick called me back and said he has never seen his product fail like this.
He was very nice to speak with. I think he was kinda shocked.
He doesn't think think I should attempt a repair.
He has requested more pics.
Sent them.
We'll see...
KT
john rogers
Apr 24 2006, 04:19 PM
Thanks for the reply Bill. I didn't remember there being two generations of the 1st generation mount? Guess I am getting old!
McMark
Apr 24 2006, 04:19 PM
Post the new pics please.
SirAndy
Apr 24 2006, 04:21 PM
QUOTE(john rogers @ Apr 24 2006, 02:31 PM)
I read the posts through several times and am still confused? Is this the early mount that uses the 4 cylinder mount ears or the later one that bolts to the bulkhead?
about 5 post up from your post:
"trekkor has the mount bar that uses the stock /4 motor mount points"
Andy
jhadler
Apr 24 2006, 04:22 PM
<best aussie accent> Good on ya mate!!
I think Jim is pretty on there. If the mount failed that badly, what other welds and/or materials are also suspect?
Yeah, that sucker's got to go. It's done. Seein' as you were gonna have to pull the motor to repair it anyway, might as well put a new mount in properly. After reading Andy's eye-witness account of a total failure, I'd pay for the peace of mind. Kindof like a friend of mine's comment about buying single layer nomex/proban driving suits. "The first time you see someone on fire, that three layer nomex suit gets REALLY affordable REALLY quickly...".
-Josh2
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 04:30 PM
The pics are nothing special.
he wanted to make sure the the bar at it's lowest points, under the stock mount location, didn't strike something.
That's the only explanation of such a failure he could think of.
There are some light scratches on there, prolly from the install in my driveway.
KT
TimT
Apr 24 2006, 04:31 PM
Engine/tranny mount failure
Click to view attachment
DanT
Apr 24 2006, 04:32 PM
QUOTE(TimT @ Apr 24 2006, 03:31 PM)
Engine/tranny mount failure
Click to view attachmentOUCH!
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 04:36 PM
the pic.
Not mount failure. Bar hitting something hard enough to rip it from the mount plate.
I would have remembered that
KT
nine14cats
Apr 24 2006, 04:42 PM
Trekkor,
I've always had great dealings with Jim Patrick on his products. I hope things turn out for you okay.
I really think you should go for his wallmount bar. But it's just my opinion.
Bill P.
Trekkor
Apr 24 2006, 04:50 PM
"Wal-Mart" bar
KT
LvSteveH
Apr 24 2006, 04:51 PM
No offense, but there is no need for any other pictures. That is a manufacturing failure, pure and simple. Even if you hit something, and bent the bar in two, it should never have separated like that........... never. If the weld tore away at the heat affected zone, then you've reached the limit of your materials and you'd see that very clearly. That point of failure would be many times that ever experienced in actual use.
I wonder who PMS has doing their assembly, because they have some "esplainin" to do.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.