Hi everyone and thanks for your input and suggestions. I value all opinions as I am by no means an expert at any of this stuff. So, If I were building a GT replica I would of course go with the GT cooler up front as it is a terrific looking solution which functions better than it looks and that says a lot. Believe me there was a moment when I was thinking about building this car that I actually made the decision to make it a GT replica with flares and all- but
with a rear valance installed (no offense to the GT's who run w/o).
Then I actually thought more about the car's history and I do feel as since there are fewer '71's than '70's, that I had an obligation to do the best I could to keep it stock looking as much as possible. That resulted in my changing course and the decision to keep it a stock-bodied Six. And I have not wavered from that decision ever since.
I mean the little changes we are making, chassis stiffening kit, early S calipers with vented rotors, GT rear calipers with vented drilled rotors, deep six wheels finished to factory standards, factory '71 color of Light Ivory (even though the car used to be gold), side-shift conversion to my Six transaxle and the addition of a Renn Shifter and linkage, a stock '89 3.2 with Motronic, exhaust with heat exchangers that appear as similar to stock as possible and yet allow the 3.2 to run correctly, F&R stock 914 sway bars and bushings, double wrapped stock steering wheel, keeping the frog warts (lights) on the fenders, keeping the stock antenna, adding LED tail lights and 3rd brake light as cleanly as is possible. All that is being done to make the car safer to operate today while still staying true to the car.
However, and I will say this again, politely, I DON'T want to cut up my trunk - really. Now if there is no other viable option, then of course I would have to do it to keep the engine cool and the car running w/o problems. I like the look of the notched bumper/valance and that is not my objection as it really is a low-profile modification. But as soon as you open the trunk.....all you see is the cooler shroud and the hoses.
So we have about 2 months to figure this out before the 3.2 gets bolted in to trial fit and mock-up everything so we have no surprises later.
Come on all you brainiacs put your thinking caps on and tell me why the front fender cooler with the GT lines and a Porsche thermostat would not be sufficient for my specific build/use.
My bias is based on two former Sixes I had. My first, a '70 with a 2.7 had no cooler at all and I was maybe in my mid-20's and drove the car pretty hard pretty regularly and it never over-heated or had a problem.
My next Six was also a '70 but I put a 3.0 with injection in it. Now that car had heating issues almost immediately. We added a Porsche thermostat and braided flex steel line up the driver's side to the front of the car and installed 2 small VW 411 (?) coolers, one behind each fog light grill. Of course I lost my fog lights but the two small coolers and the hardware connected to it ran flawlessly with no leaks and absolutely no overheating.
Those experiences are what cause me to believe that the thermostat controlled GT lines up the side of the car connected to a small by comparison to the GT cooler, cooler would likely suffice for me.
Please keep me on track and send me your ideas and thoughts. It takes a whole community to build a nice car.
You see what I did there?
Thanks a lot for your support and advise. I love these little cars.
Michael